User talk:Saintrain

Hi, it is not usual to have

Still working on it. See Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/2008-09-10#New_redirect_request_3 )though someone already declined it, I see). Saintrain (talk) 15:58, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comments on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geographical coordinates: Unicodifying minus signs by using MINUS SIGN instead of HYPHEN-MINUS will currently break most external geodata-processing tools, including, crucially, the map coordinates handling page -- can we please hold off on these changes until downstream data consumers have had time to update their tools?

Perhaps the creation of "ASCII-number" and "Unicode-number" parser functions that perform the obvious textual transformations their names imply might help this? -- The Anome (talk) 10:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your comments on that talk page: Yes, I agree, this feels very much like "painting the wheel". Please don't take any of my comments as a criticism of you personally; I can see that you're just trying to stop things breaking, rather than pushing for incompatible changes. -- The Anome (talk) 07:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Saintrain.

Some time ago we discussed the UTC clock gadget at the Village Pump. I have now gotten around to update my version of the clock with the improvements suggested by Ilmari Karonen and others. It is now fully configurable to meet all needs. Due to it being fully configurable it is now more code, but it is more efficient than any of the other versions since it is only the very small inner "updateTime" function that runs on each tick.

I have not installed my version of the clock as the gadget yet, since I think some users should test it first.

You can copy my version of the clock from User:Davidgothberg/monobook.js and put it into your own monobook.js.

Note: There are several code snippets on my monobook.js page, be sure to copy the right part. Oh, and don't forget to configure the DavidClock to tick and show as you like. As you can see I have it set to only tick once every 5 minutes since I have a very slow computer and don't really need higher time resolution.

--David Göthberg (talk) 16:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I've never been asked to be a beta tester before! But I don't think I'll be using it. It's not the implementation, though. It's just that I didn't really use it when it was installed and didn't really miss it when it was gone. Just not a clock person, I guess. Don't even own a watch anymore. Saintrain (talk) 16:37, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, yeah, it can be nice to live ones life without a clock. I have done that during some times of my life. However I only use the UTC clock to compare things within Wikipedia, not for my real world time. For instance the UTC clock helps me know when it is time to reload the watchlist or some very active talk page I have open like the Village Pump. That is, since my version shows both a static clock and current time I can see if I have had a page open for a long time since last page reload.

Anyway, if you don't feel the need for it then you should of course not test it. See you around Wikipedia!

--David Göthberg (talk) 18:19, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Saintrain, thanks for your input to the discussion we've been having.

I haven't put in a default section title yet but it seems to be working well enough for now. What do you think?

You don't think we need to bother archiving the old requests? What if someone comes back after a week and wants to find what happened to their request?

Did you see my oppose at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects#Redirect request: Palmdale Boulevard? --NE2 00:07, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure didn't. Sorry. Do what you want with it. Saintrain (talk) 14:11, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would delete it if I were an admin

db-self}}? --NE2 14:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm not disagreeing, but I'm not sure. It's part right, but OTOH how many Main Streets are also Route 66? It can always be un/done later. Still thinking. 66.214.189.209 (talk) 18:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what Route 66 has to do with this... --NE2 19:26, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I messed with yer stuff at the Science RefDesk, just trying to make it look better. [1] [2] Revert away of course, if you no likey. Franamax (talk) 05:52, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Just a heads up, I noticed where you recently closed a request for a redirect as a success, but included a declined template. I thought maybe it should have been {{

This was my fault. The "what links here" did not show up the AfC script so I didn't think anyone was using it.

Martin 23:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article

Thank you for uploading File:Peter Vredenburgh Jr.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:12, 14 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:12, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sfan00 IMG. You watching this? The photo is of a US soldier in the Civil War circa 1864 CE. That's not PD Enough? Saintrain (talk) 17:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Peter Vredenburgh Jr.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:21, 15 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 15:21, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is

). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of

talk) 18:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Ad:Template:Infobox_Venus_crater

Ad:Template:Infobox_Venus_crater

You may be interested in this discussion Bulwersator (talk) 14:49, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Farah Citadel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Parthian and Gandara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heat index table

Hi Saintrain, thanks for pointing that out to me. I think it's a bug in the mobile table rendering code because it's a rather standard wikitable. It works on my Jellybean Android phone (both on mobile and on desktop versions) but I can see the problem when I open the site on a desktop browser. I've raised a bug report at https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53524 - you can add your comments there. --Slashme (talk) 08:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Castile and León (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Galicia, Basque Country, La Rioja and Ávila

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Odoric of Pordenone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Media (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Colcol.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:58, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Semispinalis muscle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Saintrain. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Saintrain. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Saintrain. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Quoted text should remain as quote

Hi Saintrain, I've reverted your good faith change at Circus Maximus, in which you translated and linked "flute player" to aulos (a greek word), from "tibicen", its Latin equivalent (yes, it needs disambiguating from the cicada species); though less wrong than "aulos", "tibicen" should not have been used either. The entire passage is a direct quotation from Humphrey, p. 71, and editors should respect the original use of language and grammar when presenting quotations. I appreciate your reasons for the change, and your attempt to adress a problem introduced by another editor. Thanks for reading this. Haploidavey (talk) 16:23, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]