User talk:Sambostock
Feel free!
Primates category rework
After some good discussion on the talk for
Why do you support Monicasdude?
You have been endorsing statements in support of Monicasdude on the current RfC. Do you care to give a few reasons for your views? Perhaps an Outside View of your own on the RfC would help allay suspicions that you've simply been recruited to help him out. JDG 21:50, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
Other than to say that I have never communicated with Mdude, I'll avoid commenting on the matter here. I will however weigh up doing an Outside View. I consider myself too novice for this sort of thing, but if you feel that my two cents (not an exact chronology!!) is worthwhile I may contribute. I've read the whole talk page btw. --Sambostock 22:16, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
I thank you for your constructive comments on this RfC (not all of which I agree with, of course). While I don't see anything useful in debating individual points in general at this time, I would like to point out that one comment is factually off-target: "Mdude does seem to have been unconstructive by not suggesting his own wording (at least, as far as I can see, in talk)." I did propose alternative language (as suggest by user:Lulu, as a concluding statement to the discussion of Dylan's strictly evangelical phase [1], but user: Lulu deleted it (four times in 45 minutes, a gross 3RR violation that the intervening admin refused to act on!)
Dylan composed and recorded explicitly Christian songs over the course of these three albums recorded between 1979 and 1981. He has recorded religious songs regularly since that time, from "Lord Protect My Child" on
My overall preference would be that the article not include a global statement like this, but comment on the involved matters at the appropriate points in a fuller discussion of Dylan's later career, which is why I initially deleted the (factually inaccurate) conclusory statement that set off this dispute. Monicasdude 19:47, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
- FWIW Mdude, I'm in agreement with you about the Christian issue. I don't know why you flat-out refuse to recognize that FA status is more than somebody putting a tag on a page. It was a real vote and the FA version did have some virtues that are now lost (I'm not complimenting myself here-- it was basically GWO's work). You were new at the time. If you'd just admit you were a bit hasty with the big overhaul and that you're willing to discuss stuff before committing big changes, we could drop this nonsense and get on with making it a great article. Nobody would even be around half the time when you have a large change to make. I'm not saying you have to post on Talk that you have a big change and then wait indefinitely for someone to discuss it with. If no one responds in, say, 36 hours then you go right ahead... We're both stubborn. I think I've demonstrated to you that I'm not someone you can just ignore. The olive branch is out. Do you take it?.. BTW Sambostock, thanks for your input on the RfC. Of course I also am in strong disagreement with some of your points, but your comments give us a valuable perspective. JDG 05:43, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
- Ok, that's the reply (silence) I expected. Just thought I'd give it one last shot. It's damn the torpedoes time now my friend. JDG 01:57, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
FA nomination for Enzyme
Hi there. I nominated Enzyme for Featured article a while ago. As you are a Wikipedian who contributes to scientific articles, I would appreciate your feedback on this nomination. Thanks! TimVickers 16:14, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Mammals Notice Board
Announcement
Hello! I'm The Arbiter, one of the coordinators for
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Arbiter (talk) at 03:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC).
Science lovers wanted!
Science lovers wanted! | |
---|---|
Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Sarah (talk) 21:35, 16 April 2012 (UTC) ]
|