User talk:Sawyersx
August 2021
Hello, and
- Copying text from other sources
- Policy on copyright
- Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
- Policy and guideline on non-free content
If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please
Thank you, i will adress that. I appreciate the advice. Sawyersx (talk) 13:37, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
GeneralNotability (talk) 15:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- I will ignore this as utterly futile, a empty notification, and a simple attempt of censorship. It was expected that the article would be censored on terms of Wikipedia's attack on science, while using censorship to enforce it. Difference in IQ between nations and ethnicities are scientific facts. The draft was duly referenced and it shows scientific data from a century ago until recent studies. Ideological bias on Wikipedia is an extreme case of the Encyclopedia officially violating it's own rules. Could the draft make someone think that the Ashkenazi Jews have a higher average IQ? That's exaclty what the scientific studies show. Selective and ideological censorship. Sawyersx (talk) 17:52, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashkenazi Jewish intelligence (April 30)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/AFC-Logo_Decline.svg/50px-AFC-Logo_Decline.svg.png)
This draft violates Wikipedia's
See also race and intelligence and scientific racism.
— Bilorv (talk) 13:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)- Wrong. It is entirely based on science; you're using original research to bring the concept of "opportunity" to the topic. You are also using OR to disagree with the sources used in the draft. The fact that Wikipedia censors this kind of topic is only a policy to avoid delicate subjects. Your answer violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy; the article is referenced, including the topics related to Ivy League attendance, wealth and IQ. There are a lot of scientific studies duly referenced in the text. The term "racial superiority" is entirely new here, it is your words, the draft didn't say it a single time. The concept of race itself is controversial, and also, the Ashenazi Jews are descendants from Semitic-speaking people and 'Caucasoid people' (As you mention race so many times, when it's absent in the draft, i will use this old term here to follow your logic for a moment) as shown by genetic evidences that are even present in the article about Ashkenazi Jews, it wouldn't make sense talking about race here, you are doing it. The reasons for Wikipedia to censor some topics are encyclopedic conventions, not scientific rejections. Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia; the point is your justification, with is accusing the draft of using concepts it didn't use (i.e., racial superiority) and it originally brings the "opportunity" concept, without any scientific backing. The fact that the justification lies about the content of the article is degrading to Wikipedia's standards. Sawyersx (talk) 18:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)]
- Wrong. It is entirely based on science; you're using original research to bring the concept of "opportunity" to the topic. You are also using OR to disagree with the sources used in the draft. The fact that Wikipedia censors this kind of topic is only a policy to avoid delicate subjects. Your answer violates Wikipedia's
![]() |
Hello, Sawyersx!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Bilorv (talk) 13:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
|
Concern regarding Draft:Ashkenazi Jewish intelligence
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.