User talk:Sceptre/Archive 8

Hey Will, thank you so much for my Barnstar - it's great!! Everyone on #vandalism-en-wp has been nothing but welcoming and helpful since I came along 10 days ago. Thanks for your part in this, and for my new star :D T. J. Day 22:38, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OMG free pimping :D Thanks :D T. J. Day 16:09, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When does 80.231.135.27's block from editing stop? Because he just edited wikipedia and it was not correct. Tcatron565

Thanks for the quick intervention - reverting that was getting a bit tedious. Strange article to choose to vandalise - people are amused by the strangest things! Aquilina 16:23, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sceptre,

Sorry for responding so late; I was out of town the entire day today.

What works (keep please):

• green color scheme on front page only
• column of userboxes
• to do list on the front page

What doesn't work:

• userbox page needs structural definition :)
• to-do list is strange looking (maybe turn it into a remote control)
• too many lists on the "text" part of the main page and not enough bio (I'll do the bio)

Let me know what you think.

Thanks a bunch,

(^'-')^ Covington 02:40, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I must say, nice work so far. I removed the wikibreak notice (I'm no longer on wikibreak ... for now.) and added a barnstar I added recently.

• Nice work with matching the colors. And I am loving the show/hide script.
• Would you mind showing the userboxes on the front page (they are the more important ones) but hide the ones on the userbox page (the more novelty ones)? I fixed the userbox dilemma on my userpage; I had the more important ones outside of the box, and the rest in the list. I will do the same to the userbox page. Thanks.
• I'm sorry if I didn't making this clear. I'd like the subpaged linked on top of my page; the words are there but they aren't linked. Is there a way I can make the links green like the text?

Again, thanks a bunch.

(^'-')^ Covington 03:53, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think we just crossed beams there fixing "marie byles". I can't find the article anymore, but that may be a caching issue. Could you fix it? If not, I'll check later. Thanks. --W(t) 06:19, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, there it is, never mind. --W(t) 06:20, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About your userpage, i think you can take that comment off after my name, either that, or i will take my name from it completely. Thanks! :) Ali K 03:03, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Celestianpower ^háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You do realize you just broke the system do you? —

Am I allowed to delete things off of my talk page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slasher600 (talk • contribs)

Hey there,

I noticed you blocked Hipi Zhdripi (talk · contribs) indefinitely. I noticed he is evading that block under his IP 172.177.160.10 (talk · contribs).

Cheers, The Minister of War ^(Peace) 06:44, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sceptre, I appreciate your vote in my RFA. It has passed with an unexpected 114/2/2 and I feel honored by this show of confidence in me. Cheers! ←Humus sapiens ну? 04:24, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't creat the page, nor am I fond of the man behind it, but was wondering why the wiki page on "Cowboy Caleb" was deleted. By you, some time ago.

O_o — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saymawa (talk • contribs) Community consensus :) Will (^E_@) T 11:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ROFL. All right. Curiosity satiated.

I just wanted to let you know that I feel that you are too young at 15 to be an administrator. Even under the best of circumstances someone so young is simply too immature to be an administrator, and I thought the first time I learned you are only 15 (before today, although I did not bother to write in), no matter how bright you are. It reflects poorly on Wikipedia to have granted an adminship to a 15 year old, roughly the equivalent of giving Ryan Seacrest a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, which also, sadly, happened.

However it is not only your age which mitigates against your adminship but your lack of integrity and fairness. You "blocked" me for a month following a revert war with Demiurge, but he also went far beoynd 3rr and you did not "block" him, which shows why you are unqualified to be an administrator despite your tough ("I favor the one-revert rule") talk.

Btw, don't waste your time trying to block me. I can't be blocked for long, and I won't be censored. In the meantime I continue the battle against revisionists, apologists and censors (like Demiurge, and sadly others).

63.164.145.85 21:42, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:[email protected]'s sockpuppet: Kindly stop being ageist (that's not a personal attack). It has nothing to do with age, it has everything to do with maturity. I can name several admins who are around the same age off the top of my head who, if I didn't know better, I'd swear they were 20-something (by the way they act).

If you're going to attack people, don't attack on their age. Different people mature at different speeds, and it can be completely realistic to assume that there can be mature 14-15-16-17year olds, yet immature 20something year olds (I happen to know both types). It's just really low to attack someone based on their age. If you want to make comments on their maturity level, that's fine but age? Seriously, who cares how old people are? (Before you attack me because I commented, don't bother. Everything possible has been said already.) —

T • C • W) 04:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

The actual block in question was because you appear to be a re-incarnation of a banned user, not for 3RR (banned user contribs are vandalistic in nature) Will (^E_@) T 09:27, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if youve changed any other lists but on List of South Park episodes you changed all the episode names to italics and quoted WP:MOS-T when in fact WP:MOS-T says episodes of a television series should be in quotation marks. Discordance 06:22, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did it for Lost episodes as well (Doctor Who episodes are Italicated, and last two minutes longer than Lost episodes). Thanks for pointing it out!. Will (^E_@) T 09:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The

--GeorgeMoney^{Talk  Contribs} 04:18, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you all will make it without me. ;-) I will be on Wikipedia through this weekend if you still need me for something. Moe ε 17:36, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WTF?

--The Mad Bomber 20:31, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because it was a copy of my usertalk page, without content. CSD A1. Will (^E_@) T 20:38, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Authoring another is cool. Im not sure what to say though, im getting kinda tired of all of this. I came to improve articles, not become a

Besides that, the last Arb Com i was put in, they completely ignored most of my evidence, and when i asked for an explanation they just ignored me, so ive lost all my faith in them completely.

And on top of that, where do i start with listing the things he has done? Ley Shade 00:16, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You might wish to know that Deathrocker is using his comment place on the Arbcom to make personal attacks against you and myself, and has demanded that my evidence be stricken on the basis 'i dont belong in the case' and 'that im just creating lies', even though all claims have supplied diffs.

Hes also demanded that the Arbcom strips you of admin powers because apparantly, you opened the arbcom case because your a 'friend' of mine. You might want to go and make clear that personal attacks of any form are not allowed in any form, and that it being an arbcom statement is not an excuse to make personal attacks. Ley Shade 06:56, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]