User talk:Scientist418

your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Scientific articles should

to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

Editing in this way is also a violation of the

) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see

}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

MrOllie (talk) 12:19, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

December 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's

]

Sources for medical articles

Hi. When adding content about health, we typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. See

]