User talk:Seniorjackfr

Please do not add unsourced information into articles, including through images, as you did at Rustamid dynasty. Check the article's history and its talk page discussions before you re-insert something that has already been rejected previously. There's often a reason why another map or image isn't being used.

Also, I noticed you are sometimes adding images into infoboxes at full resolution (like here). Please double-check your formatting before you click on Publish. Thanks, and happy continued editing. R Prazeres (talk) 19:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've also noticed you added unsourced information elsewhere and that you have been uploading images from the internet to Wiki Commons without the permission of their authors. Before you continue, please review Wikipedia's

Verifiability) for a better understanding of what content is acceptable on Wikipedia. For uploading images, please read the licensing policy at Wiki Commons, which explains the very specific circumstances in which you are allowed to upload images there. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask me or other experienced editors, or have a look at the many help pages linked at Help:Contents. Thanks, R Prazeres (talk) 19:50, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello there R prazeres, first of all, all of the images i've added to the wikipedia pages are 100% copyright free, most of them are 500+ years old, second, for the unsourced stuff, i just forgot to add them. Seniorjackfr (talk) 19:54, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They are definitely not copyright free and definitely not 500+ years old, that doesn't even make sense with the information that you yourself provided, much less with the fact that I can see the sources for myself. Copyright is a legal issue, so make sure you understand it fully before you upload anything else to Wiki Commons. If you continue to upload non-free images, you will most likely be blocked from the site. R Prazeres (talk) 21:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

well, if you are talking about my first image uploads (djeddars pyramids) they were just testings. Seniorjackfr (talk) 22:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oryx Motors and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 09:46, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seniorjackfr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 09:46, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Oryx Motors instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be

proposed for deletion

.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oryx Motors and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, that's my article, thanks robert for your time ! Seniorjackfr (talk) 12:25, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Seniorjackfr. This is the second time that you have created an article that is a duplicate of an existing article (

Before you create articles, please check carefully that the topic is not already covered by another article, including under possible alternate names or as a subsection of another article, and please also make sure it is notable enough. (See Help:Your first article for other guidelines.) If the topic is already substantially covered as part of another article (e.g. a battle discussed in an article about a larger war), please consider leaving a message on that article's talk page or open a splitting discussion (see Wikipedia:Splitting) so that other editors can advise on whether it's productive to create a separate article. R Prazeres (talk) 15:56, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, so for the ifrenides i've tried to make an article about the emirate of tlemcen, then found out that it was already covered in another article, for the kingdom of algiers, me and other algerians are trying to make an article about this autonomous kingdom.

kingdom of algiers is completly different from the regency of algiers, even the ottomans themselves considered it as a legitimate independant kingdom,

the algerian participation in the yom kippur war is an interesting subject to talk about Seniorjackfr (talk) 16:51, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The "Kingdom of Algiers" is not completely different and a previous attempt to push this POV was deleted for good reason. Please do not attempt to recreate it, or it will be deleted again. R Prazeres (talk) 20:44, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yes it is, go study about the subject Seniorjackfr (talk) 12:48, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seniorjackfr, on Wikipedia, decisions on notability aren't based on your opinion or mine but upon community consensus. If an article has been created in the past and deleted through an

AFD

deletion discussion that's a good sign that it shouldn't be recreated. We even have a speedy deletion criteria, CSD G4, that is specifically for articles that have been deleted through AFD and then recreated.

If you have questions about notability, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:05, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for moving that, I missed that you did have a source that was formatted as a link. If it helps, sources can be cited using the ref tag format shown

here, or you can use the visual editor's automatic citation tool which is very handy. I have moved the article back. ASUKITE 15:04, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

alright Seniorjackfr (talk) 15:49, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

uhm you didn't have to do that, you could have just asked me to add refs Seniorjackfr (talk) 22:34, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Skitash. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Arab Maghreb Union, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 20:20, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you're talking about the flag?, it's literally in their official meetings (arab union meetings) Seniorjackfr (talk) 16:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dernatinus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dernatinus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 21:04, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

this article is just a traduction of the arabic version of it (https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/دارناطينوس) Seniorjackfr (talk) 16:16, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oryx Motors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oryx Motors until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fermiboson (talk) 03:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Algiers. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 17:39, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seniorjackfr. Thank you for your work on

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you mate Seniorjackfr (talk) 13:23, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.