User talk:Settdigger

September 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing across multiple articles and forums (resuming behavior since last block). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 14:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Settdigger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe I made a number of constructive contributions. Bbb23 has made it personal, which is unfortunate. Settdigger (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

First,

we don't accept unblock requests attacking others. Second, now matter how many constructive contribs do you have, you edit-warred relentlessly and made a lot of unconstructive edits. Max Semenik (talk) 18:17, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note from blocking admin. Please see this topic at ANI for recent background.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now located at
Talk to me 02:16, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

MfD nomination of User:Settdigger/sandbox

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Settdigger/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]