User talk:Sevenplusone
Welcome!
Hello, Sevenplusone, and
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
{{helpme}}
after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Luksuh 04:36, 22 April 2007 (UTC)User:Tom Liverpool FC
I'm afraid I'm not an admin, so can't block anyone! Try reporting such vandals at
]Episodes
Do you actually plan on bringing those up to standards? If not, you may want to read
- They are being worked on. --> 7+1 12:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- So would you care to show where you're getting your detailed production and critical reception information? If you're just saying that and you're just going to leave them, they'll be redirected again in another run. TTN 12:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Discuss it on the seperate talk pages. -->7+1 12:51, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- Can you just show me here instead of trying to just make me go away? If you're going to do it, you need sources. Otherwise, they'll be sitting there as they have been. TTN 12:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
No
Yes
- While I may not agree with what you say mrcrotch, I will fight to the death your right to say it. ;D --> 7+1 00:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Timesbold
- Thanks for not taking the deletion personally. You can probably get an administrator (I'm not one), perhaps the one who did the deletion, to undelete the article, at least so you can retrieve the info and not have to start over from scratch, but at the same time, I think it would be a good idea to work on the article off the wiki, either in a text editor or in user space (let me know if you need help with that), being sure you assert the notability of the band and providing reliable sources. My main concern with the article as it stood was that the article did not say why the band was notable, and thus it looked like an advertisement. I see Katr67 16:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)]
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 03:47, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank You!
Thank you. I am going to report him to administrators.
Tiesto template
I responded. --
- We should work on this together, maybe someone else will come in. But we should also add more singles! We need to recruit some individuals...I'm going to write on the Tiesto page. -- DJREJECTED 12:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)]
Magik
I Suppose i can finish off the magik series. you can start lost treasures. Alexander Vince 28 June 2007 (UTC)
excellent, i guess ill do forbidden paradise. Alexander Vince 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Template:Kilmarnock F.C. squad
The template is set at 80% width. Adding breaks to make it fit nicely on 'your' screeen may not work on other people's screens. The inherent design means that breaks are automatic, and forced breaks are unnecessary. slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 21:17, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- I think it's the bullets used (•). They have a peculiar effect on inferior web browsers. I'll use "-" in future. Thanks for the clue. slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 21:33, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- Great. Now I need to figure out which ones I've used bullets on, so I can change all of them too! slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 21:42, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Edmonton municipal election, 1960
I've reverted your edit to this page for the following reason: as I create articles on the figures who were redlinked in that article, I use the "What links here" tool as an aid in developing the article (it gives me the ability to see at a glance which elections the individual ran in, information that isn't currently centralized anywhere else). For that tool to be of any use, the redlinks in question have to stay. You'll note that only some figures in the article are linked; I have been careful to link only those on whom I plan to create an article. Moreover, I have been very careful to ensure that none of the links are misdirected.
If you disagree profoundly with my action, then revert again and I'll live with your reversion, re-inserting the links after I've created the articles in question. But in the meantime the redlinks seem to me to be doing some good and no harm.
Fair use rationale for Image:MervynAndyLuke.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to
Please go to
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ElinorD (talk) 09:38, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of NahooToo, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.celticmusicusa.com/store/products/all/497_nahootoo!/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 22:09, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use disputed for Image:DerekDYE.jpg
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Fair use disputed for Image:Folksonthehill.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DYEcast.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Damonquinn.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:20, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Arthur heckler.JPG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FreedomFightersOST.gif
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Marty McCann Priest.jpg
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our