User talk:Shaban-ul-barb

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Shaban-ul-barb!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 13:47, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ghaznavid-Hindu Shahi conflicts
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Ghaznavid-Hindu Shahi conflicts. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:28, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at
Ghaznavid-Hindu Shahi conflicts
has been accepted

Ghaznavid-Hindu Shahi conflicts
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:47, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Siege of Bhatner
(June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GoldRomean were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
GoldRomean (talk) 03:04, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Shaban-ul-barb! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoldRomean (talk) 03:04, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to

contentious
. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the

administrators
have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable
    policies and guidelines
    ;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from
    gaming the system
    .

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware
}} template.

Jay8g [VTE] 03:03, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Bhatner has been accepted

Siege of Bhatner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 13:47, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Indus River (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MCE89 (talk) 07:02, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Lahore(1043) has been accepted

Siege of Lahore(1043), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Baqi:) (talk) 19:24, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alp-Tegin's invasion of Kabul and Ghazna, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

NeoGaze (talk) 09:51, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Ajmer has been accepted

Battle of Ajmer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WeWake (talk) 00:04, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Conquest of Gwalior (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MCE89 (talk) 11:54, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Love your work

I have seen your work and i have seen that your articles looks amazing and you showcase many good aspects of Turkic history. I am kind of new to wikipedia and i was wondering if you could maybe help with my drafts if there is anything wrong or something that could be added. Iranian.Shah (talk) 15:34, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Battle of Kasahrada (1197), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 01:22, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Kasahrada (1197). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 01:21, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Alauddin Khalji's conquest of Jalore, you may be blocked from editing. - Arcrev1 (talk) 10:30, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Indus River (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Gheus (talk) 01:47, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]