User talk:Sharda Mandir

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:54, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for pointing that out. I was actually in the process of doing that while you sent the message.I have added the rationale now. thnx Sharda Mandir (talk) 07:43, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for

Hi Russ, thanks for your message. First of all I want to assure you that the apparent "

cut and paste

move" is actually not a cut and paste move. Though some of the resources used by the previous contributor happen to be the ones even I have used, it unfortunately gives an impression that its a cut and paste move. However, regarding the move feature - I have to admit I wasn't aware of it until couple days back and as such used a redirect on Gopinath Bhan page. Earler, I had tried looking for the current title and all other searched names on wiki but couldn't find it initially. Later when I did find Gopinath Bhan I wasn't very excited because this is not an oft seached string either on wiki or on google. Also when I read through the article, I couldn't help but understand why it was categorised as a stub so I created the new page under a different title based on wiki policy of giving titles (WP:AT). So Thanks for moving Gopinath Bhan to Bhagwan Gopinath.

My only issue however, is that in moving the old templates to the new talk page, wouldn't you agree it shouldn't be categorized as stub anymore? If you do, I think it would be justified to modify the template accordingly and either mention explicitly that the older version of this page under the title Gopinath Bhan was categorized as a stub and also nominated for deletion or remove that form its talk page as it creates a confusion for a new reader as it did for me. Sharda Mandir (talk) 20:17, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi, yes, I agree this article should not be classed as a stub any more. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 00:17, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sharda Mandir. You have new messages at Bgwhite's talk page.
Message added 07:19, 15 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Bgwhite (talk) 07:19, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I just wanted to get back to you regarding the above referenced article. While I haven't been online much in the past couple of weeks, I've peeked in on your work on the article. Honestly, I think you're doing a great job! I am sincerely impressed with your ability to quickly grasp and understand Wikipedia's often confusing web of policies and guidelines. A review of your work is a clear reflection of your commitment to excellence and an indicator that you are on the right path. And a value to the Wikipedia community. I'm still hanging around every now and then. If you still have questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Happy editing! Cind.amuse 11:15, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Cindy, many thanks for the message and those kind words. While the 85 degF made my day today, your message seemed like an icing on the cake. And frankly, I owe much of this to you because had it not been for your critique, I'd probably not have made it this far so soon! So thanks again! And hey, I was wondering if there is any section you'd like me to look at a little closer or any pointers that'll help me take it further. With Best Regards... Sharda Mandir (talk) 08:16, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Sharda Mandir. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sharda Mandir. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]