User talk:Shivu 03

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Shivu 03, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Shivu 03! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


Vandalism

Hi, as you are continuously adding Vandalism contents in

WP:TVCAST before addind content. Kboomika33 (talk) 10:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Don't link to drafts, please

Please don't link to draft articles as you've done here and here. We only link to articles that are in live space. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:52, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:53, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

MOS:TV

Hi there, while your efforts here are appreciated, we do not use tables to present cast lists. See

consensus via discussion on the article's talk page and present a clear explanation for why you want to deviate from community norms. On occasion, we might use a table to roughly summarise who the main cast was across a few seasons, but that would typically be used in addition to either a prose or bulleted cast list. Note also that we do not use {{won}} and {{nominated}} templates in tables that are not about awards. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello, Shivu 03

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username

Yeenosaurus
, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started,

reliable source
.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Yeenosaurus}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

talk) 🍁 07:39, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Notice

The article Giriprasad Damodar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only source is a link to Sarjano Khalid. I can find no evidence from an online search that this actor exists.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 09:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Giriprasad Damodar

Hi there, thank you for your contributions. I can't find anything about this actor! If there are sources for him, please can you link them in the article? I'm happy to help with this. Spiderone 09:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Spiderone 09:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Spiderone 09:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

January 2021

Information icon Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Alya Manasa. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Spiderone 09:47, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GSS💬 09:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PRODs of BLPs without addressing the issue, as you did at Riya Manoj, you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone 09:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
]