User talk:Shobi136

Speedy deletion nomination of Ayesha Nazir Jatt

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on

section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify

their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Clubjustin ^Talkosphere 05:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into

sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shobi136, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations

, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

GAB^gab 15:07, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayesha Nazir Jatt

The consensus at this deletion debate was that the subject was not (yet!) notable under our policies. As a politician, the minimum bar for notability is successfully being elected to office, or being appointed to serve in some high capacity. Here, we're not to that point yet. Once she has been elected, an article might work. Please do not recreate this article until that has happened, or until you've discussed the matter. Thank you. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 12:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Shobi136

A tag has been placed on

criteria for speedy deletion

, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. DexDor^(talk) 03:33, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ayesha Nazir Jutt

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion

. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

September 2016

illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Miniapolis 22:48, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply

]