User talk:Shshshsh/Archive 11

Well they shouldn't have just been deleted like that without any new discussion. I have the disclosed media company which is the contractor of the images and only myself and one or two other admin know about it. The deleting admin has no idea what agreement was made and certainly shoulnd't have speedied OTRS affirmed images without new consensus

I;ve responded on the council page. Its a legitimate agreement and a shame he still distrusts it. I promise you amigo. Got to go to bed now. See ya!

LOL!!! 12:39, 1 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding

Well it just goes to prove that other editors on this site will find fault with anything however good or valid it seems. And I mean absolutely anything. A gift was there for the taking. I didn't see any media companies contacting wikipedia in outrage did you? And that Lagaan is an excellent article - a real epic. I haven't looked into why it failed an FA yet but it looks a lot better than those FAs we talked about previously. Time and time again I lose my faith in people on this website and their ideas of what constitutes a better encyclopedia.

Sarvagnya has done exactly what I thought he would do, he is now trying to delete the Kollywood agreement too. Do you care?

I am ashamed to think of how many hours I wasted on that , going out of my way to make the agreement in the first place, tens of emails, hours spent uploading and cropping all the images to try to help people but to what gain? Why do I bother?

You have an email

Mmm. Perhaps he only likes looking at the male Bollywood stars perhaps?

Boy o boy or boy I get a hard time for helping wikipedia don't I. I have the incentive to start thousands of articles for development, filling in gaps ready to build full articles on and aside from one or two compliments all people do is frickin complain at me. I leave clear bold message at the top of my talk page clearly showing the intentions of them and still they harass me. See

Its OK now the guy has seen what the plan is and he seems a nice bloke. See ya!

LOL!! All the best amigo

Ohhh yeah baby

Ahh welcome amigo. Well we can't be here all the time can we!! Yes I seem to find the worlds hottest don't I. Next task will actually be to get out there, find these women and pull them!!!! I wish!! I just love beautiful women. LOL I;ve had the funniest of things happening today - can you believe somebody tried tagging my account page earlier for speedy deletion!!! They did it twice and when I respondedquite understandably believing they were a vandal saying "What kind of a clown put somebody's user page up for speedy deletion twice? it kicked off this aggression from an admin whose messages I kept deleting. It was as if trying to speedy my user page not only once but twice was perfectly normal and I made the greatest offence imaginable by calling him a clown!!! I was in hysterics but clearly the interfering admin wasn't. Basically I was in the middle of starting a lot of new articles and he tried to speedy one of them but got his wires crossed. I told him clearly that he is wasting his time interfering and he gave up lol! Also some beginner without an account and only about 20 edits to his name tried to afd one of my articles last night and very quickly got a withdrawal !!

Likewise where have you been? I'm afraid I'm at that stage where I've lost my enthusiasm for wikipedia which I get every now and then. I only feel like spending half on hour on here at present. Regardless of other editors sometimes I wonder why I spend so much time on here!!! At present I;m looking to join an online quiz team which provides text answers to mobile phone users. Various sites pay £12 an hour and I would be using wikipedia to research them and provide the answers if I get in. Potentially think how much can be made from mobile phones and the Internet

Hi. Oh every now and then I just get bored with being studious!! I'm quite an athletic person also, I suppose its quite rare that the two go hand in hand, but I sometimes feel I am spending rather too long on here and just need to get out more!!! I went for a run from

Oh I wouldn't leave. Just occassionally it gets tiresome. I've put in some good edits today for the Hollywood A-listers with images I have altered and I added some things to

Well I obivously think all of those actresses you mentioned are wonderful but if we're talking about all time I'd have to say

Can you find the correct link/source for

Yes exactly Riana said the limited images was acceptable contrary to Sarvagnya now. But you have to find the correct link. They are certainly not a criteria for speedying and go against any discussion or consensus to remove them. He will be reverted until he decides to discuss things AGAIN. Yawn yawn

Well I hoped that issue was old news and the decision that they were acceptable were made by consensus back in October-November time. I really do not wnat to go back to discussing images and POV again. The fact anyway that you had to revert a usual GA article reviewer anyway himself as being too POV illustrates profoundly that past concerns were hyped anyway and as it is -a clear top article.

Hey Shahid.. sorry for the late reply. I was really busy these last two days. As for the

Hi just saw your concerns on Johns page. I would personally avoid the generalisation that it was "internationally successful" as this implies that it is most countries. I would be inclined to be more specific and mention the countries that the film was most successful in, unless i am wrong and it was successful in countries of Africa, Latin America and South East Asia? Probably it was successful in North America and the states and Australia etc and perhaps many European countries some obscure like Finland and in Morocco, North Africa but I doubt it was in many others.

Why add it to the lead at all then? If you said. "The film was a considerable success in North America, Europe and Australia, grossing ??? in total internationally and screened at the Helsinki Festival and Marrakesh Festival". Theres nothing wrong with that. Its better than misleading people that the film was popular everywhere.

No but we're talking about whole continents where it wasn't popular or a success and I feel it is misleading. What is the problem with what I suggested? I'd rather be more specific and know exactly where it received the most success

Only a suggestion anyway. Hey I read Amitabh's article earlier and it really isn't all that bad. If any Indian cinema article should be an FA it is his but something tells me it would require months and months of editing to promote it. It is informative which is good but these days editors such as Sarvagnya don't look at what is important do they!! If there are enough RS's available I'd like to have a go at improving it when I have some time. Regards

I think this is already addressed in the introduction very well and you are worrying too much about it. Its very good!!

Yes its a difficult one isn't it to word it without it appearing over generalized. I would add one the end of the last sentence , "and received significant critical acclaim" .

Cool I;ve fixed the Mexican map so infoboxes can be added to places like

Well its the fact that so much needs doing everytime I log in!!, so that after some time on here you end up staying! If I don't edit then I feel that I am wasting time when things could be getting done. I added a truckload of films with red links to

I am not sure what your question is but I stated your options on the talk page.--

Aas Paas

Hi pal. I've just started

Well I've made up for it today being off! Yesterday I created a side plate for Bahrainian history and started

It is a pity that the article wasn't reviewed from a neutral viewpoint but apologies my patience wears very thin when editors like Sarvagnya and KNM are around even if he supports the objection here. Images were brought up because in the review one of the criticisms was that "there isn't a main image which would be useful"

Thats good. Even KNM has admitted that much of the previous concerns about references has been sorted and that the article is a worthy GA which is a good thing but whether it passes is another. Probably even Sarvagnya thinks it has improved. Asking to have most of the references from the NY Times is inappropriate when Times of India, IndiaFM etc are major sources in the Indian world and therefore should be seen as acceptable by a world encyclopedia not an "American encyclopedia". I have to disagree with the view that it should be written to conform with American standards. Wikipedia is global and even if 90% of editors are in "the west" it should still be written from a neutral viewpoint. I can't emphasise that enough. I'm feeling OK, I just get pretty fed up with the images issue being brought up again and again.

No your're missing what I said. You have included those reviews for the films which are international successful which is good, but you said you didn't care for any reviews from the west or east at all which is what I didn't like, and thought you wanted to remove them. For the international films one or two reviews from outside of India i think is good but only two or three maximum, I thought you were disagreeing with this and wanted to remove any non Indian reviews whatsoever. I also agreed that the vast majority of the sources in the articles should be from India as long as they are reputable. Whats the problem?

I see you were talking about readers rather than reviews of which I absolutely agree with you and think it is extremely important to not write the article specifically for somebody in the west or east. Wikipedia is global and this view that it should be written for an American is not valid. I thought you saying that no reviews outside of India were valid too.

See

Hi pal. Did I tell you that

When he was interviewing Shilpa, he was saying how he is much more up on Indian cinema than most people in the west where most people ignorantly have never heard of Zinta or Amitabh. Most people here have only heard of Shilpa and Aishwarya Rai who is often cited as the "worlds most beuatiful woman" here. Most people wouldn't evne know her name though although they.d recognize her face. Ross is always one to take the mick a bit, he was laughing about Shilpas film with the segments and the scene where she is scared of apples but he did comment on how much different modern Bollywood is to that of decades past

Are you reading my messages? See also

Of course it is Hebrew. Actually when I first saw it I thought it was vandalism and read as "Rekhaism", I'd expected to see some fan of her saying Rekhaism refers to the belief that Rekha is divine and all that and to see a speedy delete tag on it lol! You don't remember Hebrew though. Weren't you born in Israel though?

Aaaah baby Shahid. I love the Hebrew language. It looks so beautiful. I'm not surprised your parents didn't learn it either it looks very difficult to understand - everything backwards! I don't know what it is but why do so many foreign language look like the letters are all the same. I never understand chinese languages either, it just looks like a bunch of squares and you think, how can this possibly give details!! What city were you born in? Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Haifa, Bethlehem?

Cool. Yes I like certain types of middle eastern music in general. I remember when i was in Turkey and there were these arabian belly dancers and musicians -well you know me I love all things exotic! That was back in 1995. I was about 12 and was quite enjoying watching those sexy women dance!! Not a fan of Eurovision I must admit its an LGBT convention really isn't it, its pretty bad - Her Tranship

Don't know if you have heard of

Ah yes he's my cousin. You'd think he be willing to donate some of his money to me wouldn't you lol!! I bet its really hot where you are at present -I'd be out in the sun if I didn't have to work!! I think its great that you still take it under your wing to be the "guardian angel" for these main Bollywood articles. They face a lot of crap don't they!! Happy days!!

Gorgeous isn't it. So peaceful and calm. There's something about the native Hawaiians that is very precious. They move me spiritually

No as that's detracting from what the article is about. If there are any historical comments such as inaccuracies in the script this would be good but not too much about a name which isn't even the title of the film. If he is a sock puppet though and is using multiple accounts to damage articles, you should report him as John suggested above.

Afd of

I;ve done it again. Check out how classically BEAUTIFUL!!

You saw that did you? Yeah I took that as a compliment although one of Sarvagnya's friends turned up and tried to make me feel crap. Never mind I had two barnstars in one day so not all bad. I know what I'm doing and how to build content in the most efficient way possible, but there are still people who don't know who I am. Sarvagnya's crony mocked the arbitration committee for supporting my work. How they've never seen my name in the recent changes beats me! I'm just in the middle of finding images for all the Peruvian writers. Some of them such as