User talk:Shshshsh/Archive 13

(4/2/2008) Shshshsh, I have put back the link to Aamir Khan's blog - http://www.aamirkhan.com/blog.htm. As mentioned before in my edits, I am not a spammer. I am just a fan of Aamir Khan. If you feel that the link should not be on the Aamir Khan page, let's discuss. I do not know if you have read the blog, but it is on his official website. And from the posts, it is definitely Aamir who is writing the blog. Thanks - Maisnam —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maisnam (talk • contribs) 07:26, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(4/2/2008) Shshshhsh, I am sorry that your reverted my edit without any discussion. You mentioned that if an actor writes his/her own blog, it is not important enough to be put in the External Links section. What you are saying is not true. The Wikipedia page about hollywood actor Alec Baldwin has a link to his blog. Please point me to any Wikipedia guidelines which say that an actor's blog cannot be on the External Links section of the Wikipedia page. --Maisnam (talk) 20:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(4/4/2008) Shshshsh, I have not heard back anything from you yet. I am going to add the link to Aamir Khan's blog back. If you have any concerns, please discuss on your Talk page or contact me before removing the link. I hope we will respect each other's opinion. Thanks. --Maisnam (talk) 01:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

Shahid what I typed on Amisha's page was not mindless gossip. I actually got the info from glamsham.com. They recently posted an article regarding Amisha's absense from the press release of YashRaj's new movie! As far as Im concerned that is news related to the movie! Thankyou.

Shahid, it looks like

01:20, 23 March 2008

Is it a typical Abbas-Mustan kind of film?? How were the performances?? Tell me something about the film!!! LOL. I have to wait until my exams are over to see Jodhaa-Akbar and Race. Not fair!! :( --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 01:27, 23 March 2008

Buddy, you sound like a critic!! LOL.. Looking at the future for fun, which film do you think will fare better? Race or Tashan?? Can't wait to see the both of them!! I want to ask you for the ending but I don't want to ruin it for myself!!!!! :( --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 01:39, 23 March 2008

Characters???? LOL!!! OMG!! Oh well, it looks like I have to wait!! --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 01:49, 23 March 2008

LOL.. I am not mad that you gave me the ending!! LOL.. Well the only thing I know is that more than one person dies in the film. LOL.. Probably Saif Ali Khan and someone else... (Bipasha Basu) maybe... LOL. I am going to keep on guessing until I finally see the film. ;) LOL --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 01:56, 23 March 2008

Have a good night!! --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 02:10, 23 March 2008

Hey buddy! Just found out that you are going on a trip. Anyways, have a safe trip and hope to see you back soon!! --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 19:39, 23 March 2008

I will try my best to do so. My exams will be beginning in about 2 weeks and I have some papers due at the end of this month too. I will be making very few visits on Wikipedia just to revert vandalisms (You can notice by my edits that I have been doing only that for the past couple of months) but don't worry everything will be fine when you come back. :) --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 19:49, 23 March 2008

Shahid, I have a question about the BollySpice Awards. I know that you said that it is unreliable but those awards are chosen from votes by the public as well. This is what it says: "After the overwhelming work of days and nights, our members put together a list of nominations with the help of our panel of judges. The list was based on the quality of the films and their success at the box office. These nominations were then put forward in online polls in our forum. Around five thousand votes were collected in the the time span of one month and the winners were declared today." What do you say?? --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 19:54, 23 March 2008

BollywoodSargam??? Did you mean RadioSargam?? --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 15:23, 24 March 2008

Hey buddy, thanks for your kind words!! I really appreciate what you did with the article. With your edits, that section has improved a lot. Basically for that section, I had the first paragraph for the film, the second for the performances, and the third for the director and the chemistry between the lead pair. That's why, I think that there were so many of each reviews. LOL. BTW, I thought that you were on a trip. What happened?? --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 02:08, 29 March 2008

LOL, I know that it is still divided into the three sections but your version is way better than mine. LOL. Sounds like you had a great time on your trip; sounds really interesting. =) --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 20:00, 29 March 2008

Hello friend. If anybody doubted any of the stubs I've started see

]

Anywhere nice? Great Barrier Reef? Alice Springs?, Adelaide?

]

I've always wanted to visit the great barrier reef. But after what happened to Mr Crikey. No biting mite. Steve Irwin it makes you wonder about all those creatures that may sting you or make mince meat of you. Great whites for one

]

LOL check out the main DYK . Ljubljana! Did you see

]

Yes I created most of the articles in it too!! They were all missing! The amazing thing is articles like

]

Well if you think about how potentially enromous wikipedia could develop it gives you a brain ache doesn't it!!! A Portuguese user the other day asked if I had thought about cloning Blofeld and producing some more Blofelds!!! -which was a compliment but a pretty funny one lol. When are you off on your travels anyway?

]

Shshshshshshsh!!! Its all soo quiet!!

Bjork

Have you gone back to not speaking?

$1,000,000?

14:01, 28 March 2008 (UTC) Yes I haven't had the taste for wikipedia the last few days either. Sometimes I would rather do something different than look at a computer screen. I wondered if you had gone off on holiday or something. Do you think its about time you took the next step with Zinta? (I don't mean a marriage proposal of course, however nice this may be)

$1,000,000?

14:07, 28 March 2008 (UTC) I always thought that was a great article too. Its a shame that people over edit articles which are already excellent and in the end the article degrades.

$1,000,000?

14:15, 28 March 2008 (UTC) Well I;ve restored it to its former bersion and I am going to leave a huge message saying to editors to try to condense it again WITHOUT ruining the article. Somebody will probably revert me but they made a complete hash of it over the last few weeks]

I don't understand why people have to keep editing an FA article. The version that was there earlier today was so much worse than it was several months ago. All it needs is to be condensed taking heed of neutrality and to highlight the main points. In fact it angers me when I see great articles eroded

]

Che Guevara is now back to 135kb. It needs some serious condensing but it should be done properly and not ruin the article like before.

]

I was about to, but I fear that there will be some outrage and an edit war. You can't degrade an article like that its terrible. If it is to be cut it is to be done properly and within neutral grounds so that the bulk of the information relayed isn't taken out. It would be fairly easy to shorten it considerably and retain much of its content and balance.

$1,000,000?

15:07, 28 March 2008 (UTC) I think it is very good to use books for articles like ]

I wasn't aware you were interested in Bollywood films pre 1970, although I remember you mentioning that 1957 classic

]

I have to say she looks like an absolute legend of old Bollywood. Shame she died so young. I've added some images perhaps you could identify which films they are from?

$1,000,000?

15:39, 28 March 2008 (UTC) Well shes not unattractive but she isn't really my type although she looks a legend. She looks Pakistani I think rather than Indian.

$1,000,000?

15:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC) Ah I was right she's an ethnic Pashtun

$1,000,000?

16:05, 28 March 2008 (UTC) Mmmm have I done enough to save

$1,000,000?

17:17, 28 March 2008 (UTC) The thing is nobody could argue that those series of articles are really encyclopedic. What written encyclopedia would ever dream of having pages on fictional characters?. They are intended to be fun whilst providing something useful to the reader who is interested in the subject. If wikipedia was a traditional encyclopedia then tens of thousands of article would be thrown out pronto ]

Well its inevitable that they would react the way they did -I mentioned this. I guess if you work at seomthing for weeks and it has got worse rather than better then they can't accept it. I was going to have a go at really trying to condense it and write what I thought would become a very good article today using what was there originally and make it even better, but now I am not permitted too. Well I wish them luck ; I just don't like to see a great articles eroded into something poorer for the sake of a few kb. I could rewrite it around 75kb but its their loss

$1,000,000?

12:47, 29 March 2008 (UTC) Oh and I wonder why Sarvagnya turned up with a strong delete at the Die Another Day LFD ]

Yup I think some central american women look beautiful particularly Nicaraguan women check out the girls on the main article. I find Barbara Carrera in her hey day as one of the sexiest women going, she is Nicaraguan I think. My cousin , you know the tree surgeon married a Honduran women and evne when I first met her when I was only about 6 I had a crush on her -she had beautiful olive skin and pearly white teeth, sort of a bit like Halle Berry.

I've just been browsing through the caribbean and central american articles -my sister is in Costa Rica this week visiting all the vlocanos and national parks and stuff (as a sibling of Blofeld would lol)

]

I know man. She looks like an ancient African goddess

$1,000,000?

18:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC) See her here. Sometimes I think she looks more central american -you know the ]

I know what you mean, I have a huge crush on the newreader

]

Anyway off the subject of women, do you like the films of

$1,000,000?

19:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC) I can't bleieve Sarvagnya has commented at the

$1,000,000?

21:50, 29 March 2008 (UTC) I get the impression that you think so lowly of that particularly editor that you won't even waste a single word discussing him or mention of him as you believe he isn't worth it. You my friend are absolutely right. Anyway clocks have gone forward an hour here have to go now. See you soon. Byeee!

$1,000,000?

22:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC) Congratulations friend I don't know why they didn't give it to you earlier. Who gave it to you?

$1,000,000?

13:16, 30 March 2008 (UTC) Yeah I;ve just seen. This means you can now spend more time expanding articles and creating articles rather than spending time reverting vandalism of course

$1,000,000?

13:19, 30 March 2008 (UTC) I've been encountering a bit of discouragement today which is always a bit annoying. Someday people will realise that in starting articles like

$1,000,000?

19:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC) As it appears Babita's last film was in 1972 then a replaceable image of her now is not appropriate as it doesn't identify her during her career which the article discusses. I was discussing this issue with User:Rettetast the other day who does a lot of tagging for images and I believe he agrees with me. Now nearly 40 years on, to expect to be able to obtain a free image of her as an old woman which has no relation to her past career is yes quite ridiculous. As long as it has a rationale to explain why the image is appropriate nd why a free altertative cannot adequately give the same info this should be fine. I'm having an off day today; won't be editing today 14:16, 31 March 2008 (UTC) I didn't know that. Can you revert him for me - I'm off today. Its one of my anti-computer days today lol. My templates aren't public mainspace rationales they are MINE!!! But mis amigos can use them. Within reason I think the rationale for retired actors is perfectly adequate, obiviously if it was a year ago they retired not very valid but at least ten years I'd say yes. Also it depends on whether they are still commercially active in other fields and still in the public eye in another form, i.e. it is more valid for those which are no longer in spotlight and look a lot different to when they were in their prime. Ciao 14:35, 31 March 2008 (UTC) Hi. Right what seems to be the trouble? 17:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC) Mmm. ]

There we go I've created a new template

]

Well fingers crossed people will find that acceptable. My rationales in the last six months seem to have warned off any bots or taggers but the ones from mid 2006 are now catching up with me!! Great news, see the articles

]

Looks great doesn't it. Editors like Dahl and the slovenian wikipedians are extremely valuable to this project -I only wish we could recruit more editors from each of these countries -things would develop big time. Unfortunately the Danes and Norweigans on here never seem willing to translate -hence the majority of stubs we have on those countries, particularly Norway -I've rarely seen a Norwegian article beyond a start class. I;ve created alist at

]

Have you seen it? Need some help. Universal Hero (talk) 21:42, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It means a sabbatical...at the least. Universal Hero (talk) 18:14, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmmmm, they'll have to wait. Universal Hero (talk) 18:22, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to your deletion with the reason of unsourced comments, please see reference that says the following URL:

Television artiste Gracie Singh (of Amanat, ZEE TV) was chosen over established stars like Nandita Das, Rani Mukherji and Sonali Bendre for the female lead.

Secondly, please see this URL that says:

Besides Shah Rukh, I approached Abhishek Bachchan. Abhishek Bachchan He loved the film, but when I had gone to him with my proposal they were planning to launch him with JP Dutta -- it was a career move they had to make. I think they were right in those circumstances. If he had done this, it would've become his launch film. I think he would've played it differently too.

The second of the above, could however, be rephrased for sure. You may want to revert your edits. Mspraveen (talk) 15:16, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The names of these actresses, which I did not notice, have been re-added. As for the second one, the sentence I think he would've played it differently too. does not imply that the other actors "might not have played the role better than Aamir". It means that they would have played the role differently, not better.

Also, I noticed your last edit. You replaced the word "and" with "which", which implies that the mentioned "plus" is Gracy Singh's time, and not Gracy herself.

Shahid • ^Talk2me 15:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In response, I'd say that I understood his answer to me saying that he was very glad to know that Gracy could afford all of her time and that made his task all the more easier. So, in fact in that interview, he was referring to her time. Don't you agree? Mspraveen (talk) 14:48, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, I noticed it late last night, but I felt too lazy to thank you for taking out time in sharing your observations. I'll work on it in a while. Thank you very much indeed! Mspraveen (talk) 15:01, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following images for which I tagged Di-no license template on these image description pages Image:Waheeda Rehman.jpg and Image:Raakhee Gulzar.jpg, I noticed that you have removed these tags. In fact, the tag says that:

Please do not remove this tag. Note if you believe that a free replacement image cannot be reasonably found or created please add one of the following without removing this tag

I further wish to tell you that the

]

Hmm...I'm not quite sure your rationale explains this in detail. Though you write in detail, for a living person a rationale like you said on my talk page can be provided as your reason below that di tag. Let the admins decide. This images are a tricky issue. As far as I see, a free replacement can be found. Thoughts? Mspraveen (talk) 15:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As an addition to what I said before, you may see Jessica Lange. Though, she was at her prime in her hey days, there is no image on her page coz of wikipedia's image policies that encourage free content. Mspraveen (talk) 15:18, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I think it would be quite inappropriate of you deleting these tags and instead you should consider providing your reasoning and let the admins decide. I'm tagging them, including that of Babita, back with di-fair-use template. Please make sure you provide your reasoning appropriately. I hope that your thoughts are true and these images can be retained, but lets wait and watch. Mspraveen (talk) 15:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! I'm sorry. I must have overlooked one image maybe. That was not my intention anyways. I was removing the images from the actor pages wherever I felt inappropriate. I'll watch out anyways. Mspraveen (talk) 15:41, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What could be done to debate the use of the image in the actor page? Suggestions? If you were to ask me, I would remove it because I feel that it violates first criteria of fair use. You would provide a reasoning for its use. But, this predicament will remain, wouldn't it? Mspraveen (talk) 15:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did that already! :) Yes, thanks that you agreed to my thoughts. Mspraveen (talk) 15:54, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Shahid, how are you doing buddy?? I am practically done University. Now, I just have to finish my exams, which begins in about two weeks. After that, I am free. =) LOL. Anyways, remember I told you that there was some good news before. The good news is that the

. After that, I was in constant contact with the makers of IndiaFM informing them about the licence and everything. After that, Riana sent our conversations to OTRS. I am so happy that this is finally solved and we know have images for Bollywood articles.

Note: Read the licence carefully. To avoid the mess like what was the case with the Bollywood Blog images, we have to upload images in batches, for e.g. three-four images. BUT it must first have to pass through the OTRS system. You have to e-mail them at "[email protected]", providing the links of the pictures from the IndiaFM website. After they notify you that everything is okay, you can then upload the images onto Wikipedia. BTW, when sending an e-mail to OTRS, you have to store the ticket number in the subject of the e-mail (which the members of OTRS created to distinguish between things) and refer to it when sending them the images to process. I will send you that via e-mail. If you have any questions regarding this matter, feel free to let me know. Regards --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 16:21, 1 April 2008

Hey, thanks for the barnstar buddy! I really appreciate it! It feels great when your work is recognized. So everything is clear regarding the images and the licencing?? --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 16:33, 1 April 2008

Have you heard the music of Tashan? The music is not bad but I expected more from it. Nonetheless, a good hearing. I like Falak Thak and Dil Haara the best!! Chhaliya and Dil Dance Maare are not bad but Tashan Mein is a bit dissapointing --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 18:57, 1 April 2008

Thanks buddy!! I hope I rocked the exams!! I studied my ass off!! LOL... So what has been going on with you these days?? Oh, I forgot to tell you. I finally got the chance to see Race. It is quite a good movie. I am looking forward to watch Jodhaa-Akbar as well. BTW... are you interested in watching U, Me aur Hum? I am.... The reports have been quite good so far. --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 19:53, 12 April 2008

I am doing fine!! I hope we will be able to create some more GAs during this summer!!! --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 00:46, 13 April 2008

Shahid, I finally uploaded the

IndiaFM images. What do you think of them?? Since we have to send images in batches, I already uploaded the first batch. I am getting ready for the second batch (Karisma Kapoor, Amitabh Bachchan, etc.) Are you still looking for more images on Zinta's page. If so, let me know, so I can put both of ours together and send an e-mail to OTRS. You can find them and send me the link to the images. --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk

05:42, 14 April 2008

We need to upload images in small batches so it would be easier for the people in the OTRS system. User:Riana recommended to do it like that instead of sending one image at a time. She explained that they're really busy so it would be more appropriate to do it like that. As for uploading the images, anyone can do it as long as the instructions are followed. Do you get the long procedure?? Are you still looking for more images on Zinta's page. If so, let me know, so I can put both of ours together and send an e-mail to OTRS. You can find them and send me the link to the images. --Bollywood Dreamz ^Talk 16:06, 14 April 2008

Warm greetings from the Bald One. Hope you are well!!!

]

Where are you???????

]

Ah I see. I thought you had gone on holiday or something. Hey good to see Bette Davis on the front page!!!

]

Hello friend howz things? Always good to hear from you. I wasn't here on the weekend either

]

Today I created

]

I don't know I see that Bollywood (Rahul) hasn't uploaded any images. I did find it slightly concerning that only three could be uploaded at a time - this will be sure to confuse some editors. I hope it works out and we can begin to see the goods!

]

LOL we now have 273 pages on museums in greece and athens. Now they need some serious development. Even musuems like

]

I'm really into ancient egypt as well and the holy land. There is something really special about all those pharoahs and the biblical lands isn't there. I think I started over half of the pharaohs we have on here and about 12 dynasty categories!!

]

Check out the image on

$1,000,000?

19:17, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Yes I see what you mean, What sort of editor creates an article on a greek museum one moment, a French river the next, a Ukrainian hotel, a Norwegian admiral and then a Turkish film . Mm LOL

$1,000,000?

21:25, 7 April 2008 (UTC) LOL my latest is

$1,000,000?

21:41, 7 April 2008 (UTC) LOL he looks rather like

$1,000,000?

21:49, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Hello friend. Ahhh I've had a horrible day on here. I really feel quite unwelcome sometimes. There are many editors on here I just can't see eye to eye with , personality opposites or something I don't know but it can get pretty infuriating on here.

$1,000,000?

21:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC) I'll send you an email shortly ]

Rang De Basanti

Hey, I started reviewing but then I read your comments on the talk page. Are you reviewing it?--Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 11:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, please feel free to step in if you see something I don't. Cheers.--Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 11:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I brought back one sentence from the old revision... which is the sony's copyright infringement case on Bollywood. Search for [1] in google and you will get atleast one full page of relevant results. I've cited from four different sources, including Economic Times.

This is what I've added...

However, Sony Picture and Overlook entertainment is considering to sue Bollywood's Eros Entertainment and Sohail Khan's K Sera Sera for 30 Million US Dollars for copyright infringement on their English movie Hitch^[1][2][3][4].

Mugunth^{(ping me!!!,contribs)} 03:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Yes, Chak De has a long way to go. But it shoul ddevelop into a GA. Regrding article on Chak De Girls, you are probably correct in thinking that it would be up foe deletion, or, merging with the film article.Dwaipayan (talk) 03:49, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And, don't you think it's time for

Peer Review?--Dwaipayan (talk) 04:00, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply

]