User talk:Shshshsh/Archive 21

hey shahid, he definetely prefers his name to be spelled as "Niigaam" due to numerology aspects... so with respect to the singer himself, we're spelling his name mainly the way he will spell it himself - have a look at his recent album .... lg, tanja06 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanja06 (talk • contribs) 13:17, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, why not! You are not a principal contributor, so you are definitely eligible. --Dwaipayan (talk) 22:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I am very much busy now, hardly get any time to be here in WP.--Dwaipayan (talk) 22:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shahid, out of the three references I added, I think this and this are perfectly alright. However, we can do without this one. Before I added those refs on Kapoor's articles, I looked through Zinta's & Jolie's articles to see what kind of sources were used there. I see what you mean though Jolie's article uses a source similar to this one. That's why, I think this one should be fine! Just a note: I am going to remove this one as I don't think it is needed. Regards -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 18:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL Shahid!! ;)) Yeah, I am going to the concert along with my friends and girlfriend!! I wouldn't miss it for the world!! I'm reallie excited to see Zinta & Akki.. This will be the second time, I see Ms. Zinta!! Who cares bout the Bachchans.. LOL.. I'm jokin!! I'm excited to see them too!! BTW, will they be comin to Melbourne?? I know that you're dyin to see Zinta... aren't u?? ;)) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 19:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL ;)) Unfortunately, according to the concert's official website, they won't be coming to Melbourne. They kick off the show in Toronto followed by Trinidad & Tobago, Los Angeles, San Fansisco, Houston, Atlantic City, Chicago, New York, Vancouver, London and finally end it off at Amsterdam. BTW, my friend's dad is associated with the concert so he managed to get us VIP tickets!! ;)) Sorry about braggin more!! LOL ;)) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 19:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry!! I will!! ;) -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 19:41, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phew I'm exhausted now!! I've nearly finished sorting out the structure for places in Malaysia! I must have notched up over 800. Have a look at these nice images I found on my travels

An oldie

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding me about this user's IP. I was aware of it, and you're right, its clearly (only) used by User:Srkhan2. Since he has been continuing to edit from that IP after the block on his account, I have now blocked the IP for the same 1 month duration. Thanks again, Gwernol 11:00, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HI Shahid I've asked some good copy editors to address the Kapoor article. COuld you join in at the peer review and help address any concerns if you have a moment. Thanks

I realize you really like the movie Phir Hera Pheri, but please be subjective in your assumption that it is definitely original. Search "Phir Hera Pheri" and "plagarism" in google, and you will find many others pointing this out as well. You've been a stellar contributor to Wiki, don't let your over-enthusiasm to "protect" the director when you cannot even know for sure if he did/did not copy the plot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhanzhao (talk • contribs) 02:33, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll surprise you. I didn't like it at all. That answers all your questions. Shahid • ^Talk2me 07:16, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, however your own post of "I don't compare - it's OR" is more than enough to show your subjectiveness towards this matter. Your attempts to empasise your own POV with misrepresentation, your constant reversions, unexplained edits all can be considered vandalism. I hope you do learn that.

As for your point about it being OR, keep in mind that many people have seen both films and noted the various similarities, plotlines and plot devices (right down to the precious guns and the ending cliffhanger).

References were cited. You did not provide a single one. Are you sure you are NPOV? Considering your interest in this field, thats debatable, but we shall leave it at that.

You yourself were willing to downgrade your posts from removing claims of inoriginality to ammending your choice of words from an "(authorized) remake" to "heavily inspired by". Your edits speak for themselves.

You were the one that tried to step in and "defend" this movie, I merely undid your your vandalism.

Again, all this is easily VERIFIED by comparing the wiki plot synopsis, or even any online reviews about the film from imdb. But you refuse to. If you think either plot synopsis on the wiki is wrong or has been purposely "vandalised" to hint at plagiarism why don't you delete those as well? You can't.

If you're unhappy about my edits, getting an NPOV editor on it will solve this right away. I would really welcome it.

The page is much better now. It mentions the source movie, compared to your edits which removed any mention of it. Good enough. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhanzhao (talk • contribs) 08:48, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhanzhao (talk • contribs)

Hey Shahid, I am leaving for vacation tomorrow (July 28) and won't be back for about a week. Could you please keep an eye on Kapoor's article as well as all the other ones?? I would really appreciate it!! Thanks!! ;) Best Regards -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 04:24, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks bud!! I really appreciate it!! ;) Regards -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 19:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!! Yes, finally decided to for it, since I shall hopefully have some intermittent free times in the next 2 weeks. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey first of all sorry cause i dont know where to post thee question so here i posted.second why did you eidted that bollywood line i wrote which is 100% true.i said some arabic channels here in the gulf where i live shows bollywood movies on their channels with subtitles the channel name are given by me for proving as i myself see them!!!! so plz put that line back ok!!!!!!if u want more prove [email protected] thats my id email me and i will give you these arabic channels site for u to see yourself ...thank you very much for reading my appeal!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Junaidrocks80 (talk • contribs) 20:37, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it's true, but A) It was not well written. B) It was unsourced. Shahid • ^Talk2me 09:17, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK U WANT SOURCE WELL THEN HERE'S THE SOURCE NOW PLZ PUT BACK THE LINE OTHERWISE I WILL PUT IT!!! http://www.apunkachoice.com/scoop/bollywood/20080102-1.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Junaidrocks80 (talk • contribs) 06:26, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please calm yourself and be

WP:RS. Apunkachoice is not considered to be reliable. Find a better source please. Shahid • ^Talk2me 12:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

For full disclosure, it may be worth looking at the discussion

here where it involved more editors than just Girolamo. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 13:45, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

It has absolutely nothing to with just that discussion and I'm sure you've seen examples of things like this before. I don't mind either way what happens to the templates whether they are replaced with a see also section or not. My main concern is that EVERY time I comment on a WP:Film discussion page I end up being prompted by Giro or made to reconsider my values or made to feel like my freedom of speech is no longer acceptable. If I can't freely express my views without somebody hovering every time then I really don't want to be part of the project.

Shahid, remember I told you that Kapoor launched her own clothing line in association of being the brand ambassadress for Globus?? Anyways, I was thinking of adding it to her article. Where do you think would be the appropriate place to add that info? I was thinking of adding it to either the "In the media" section or the "Other work" section. If its the latter, do you think another sub section should be created for that?? Regards -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 01:49, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the confusion. Between the two choices, it is the former: Kapoor launched her own clothing line in association with Globus. -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 00:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shshshsh.

Shahid... Have you watched Singh Is Kinng?? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 20:50, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately no!! :( Just like you, I am really busy these days as well!! -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 02:05, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy stranger!! You might be interested in reading this article. Up for an FA within ten days of creation!!

Kya hua yaar??? Why are you leaving Wikipedia?? It is going to be so lonely without you!! :(( -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 02:18, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The section is very poorly written Hopefloat and I'm sure I'm not the only one who can see that. A complete paragraph is not referenced, "he got this" etc - it looks like a non fluent or lesser educated editor has added it. I've added the tags for now.

IMO, that section is completely irrelevant for a

biography article. I mean the issues mentioned there are either not really controversies or not related to SRK. Manoj Kumar incident has more relevance to OSO article and shouldn't be mentioned in personal biography. Verbal duel with Salman Khan is so trivial to mention. Every person on this earth is bound to have numerous such incidents in his/her life. The section can be safely nuked. Gnanapiti (talk) 21:14, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I do not understand you are adding controversy in amithab bachchan section and you do not let other people enter controvery which shape sharukh life in his section. Why these 2 standrads. Just relax and let document the truth. You with different name are removing section. Please stop this non sense. thanks. Happy 15th Aug. I like the cake —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hopefloat (talk • contribs) 22:36, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!! WOW I can't believe it is august 15 already!!! Have a great day. Did you have any nice presents?? What are you doing?

Are you going out for a birthday meal or anything? Did you get any presents?

Many Many Happy Returns of the Day Shahid!! Hope this day is filled with lots of memories & happiness!! You're a very nice human being and will always be a close friend indeed. Keep up the good work and don't forget to come back and visit. The sad part is that in about 2-3 weeks, University will be starting again and therefore I won't be able to come on Wikipedia as often as I do now. Everyone seems to be leaving Wikipedia these days!! :(( -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 17:35, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brother, if you have concerns use the discussion page please. If you want others heed your user name and act accordingly, well it might be a bit difficult. Now, please tell me what all "important" informations did I remove? Thanks for you advice, but you might as well take a look at some of the cardinal wiki policies. OpelC (talk) 18:08, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HAPPY BIRTHDAY BUDDY!! Universal Hero (talk) 22:08, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What your leaving? :( :(.....just a wikibreak, right? :( Universal Hero (talk) 22:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I was fine until I read about your proposed departure. Anyway, so after two months, you'll still be a contributer on a small scale, yes? Universal Hero (talk) 10:13, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're very secretive. You still didn't tell me how old you were.

OpelC (talk) 11:00, 16 August 2008 (UTC)== SHAHRUKH KHAN ==[reply]

Brother, if you have concerns use the discussion page please. If you want others heed your user name and act accordingly, well it might be a bit difficult. Now, please tell me what all "important" informations did I remove? Thanks for you advice, but you might as well take a look at some of the cardinal wiki policies. OpelC (talk) 18:08, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I shall reinsert "the fact that he is a muslim", along with the info that "he married Gauri Khan in a Hindu wedding ceremony", lest some riot should occur. I am most happy to work with you for the betterment of articles. Nevertheless, I stand by the changes that I made, and I do not believe the removal of some portions is, in any way, an insult to an editor's toil. OpelC (talk) 20:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have gone back to the earlier version. Good! The entire portion is badly worded or phrased. You claim, you have spent enough time on wikipedia to familiarize yourself with it's policies. And in the very lead, one can find something I identify as a peacock term. Now, it is mentioned Shahrukh's WAX STATUE is available at madame Tu......... Can we buy it, then?

You undid my contribution on Hrithik Roshan article, deleting his family background and education which is written mainly in the Early life section in all the articles. What do ya mean by "not a good idea"? Pls justify. Randhirreddy 09:08, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

If you have time have a watch of this. It is a documentary on a British guy going

Shahid.. I needed to ask you something. Now that it is almost the end of 2008 (well there is still 4 more months left), Kapoor's career section will have to be expanded to mention her 08 films. I have a few questions regarding her first 08 release Tashan. Apart from mentioning that the film did not do well at the box office as well as the film marked her comeback to the Yash Raj Films' banner, do you think anything else needs to be added such as a brief synopsis/summary of the film or a critic's review? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 17:51, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problems with the way it is written right now!! As a matter of fact, I never did!! The reason I asked you was because I remember that during Zinta's FAC, a user told you to expand on her film, The Hero. Out of all the films Zinta did in 2003, The Hero was the least notable one thus you hadn't mentioned much about it.. except for her co-stars and the fact that it didn't do well at the box office. I don't want to make it look like I am giving too much prominence to her successes whilst her failures are described in one-two sentences. Anyways, how would you describe Kapoor's role in Tashan as?? What about.. Kapoor portrayed the role of Pooja Singh, a femme fatale who seduces men to achieve her goals. LOL.. BTW, have you seen Bachna Ae Haseeno?? The film is not that bad!!! Just to let you know, I updated the section. Let me know what you think!! Regards -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 17:45, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just like how I did an analysis of the reviews she received for her other films, I did the same for Tashan. Please take a look when you have time and let me know if you still have some problems. As for your second concern, I included that the film was a critical as well as a commercial failure. If you feel anything needs to be changed, kindly let me know or you can do it yourself. Regards -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 02:00, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys, hows it going? :) -xC- 13:34, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I understand where you're getting at! However, there are some problems!! For e.g. the word "high-profile" can be removed easily but how would you use describe her roles in K3G & Tashan, which uses words like "cosmetic beauty" & "femme fatale". Can you think of any other ways to describe her roles in these films?? I'll take a look later on and see what I can do!! If you could make some changes according to what you feel is right for the article, I would greatly appreciate it.
• Don't you remember.. I told you that I was going to the Unforgettable show with my friends and girlfriend. LOL. Let me tell you, the show was awesome and I had a great time!! Since my friend managed to get us VIP tickets, I was also fortunate enough to meet the actors. All of them were sweet and kind, especially Akshay Kumar. :))
• In terms of her body shape and looks, Minissha Lamba does resemble Ms. Zinta sometimes!! There were times in BAH when she looked like her. -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 02:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky devil. How are you Shahid? Still having trouble with IPs?

-xC- 11:44, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. Obviously impressed by my user pages and thought he would self entitle himself to my hard earned barnies huh? Hehe

Hahah LOL "Superhero" LOL he makes it sounds like it is all based on Spider man or something. How many times has he been reverted now?. Sigh sigh

Hey friend!! How are you these days?? You haven't responded to most of my messages!! How come?? Anyways, have you watched the new trailers for "Heroes" and "The Last Lear"?? Both the films looks really interesting!! The former will be releasing during the Diwali season on Oct 24/08 whilst the latter will be releasing on Sept 12/08!! BTW, I need to ask you one more thing. Since The Last Lear will be releasing worldwide on Sept 12/08, don't you think it would be more appropriate to move it to the "08" year in Zinta's filmography?? -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 01:52, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy just logged in. Como estas? Well the Indian express quote seems to tell a lot more about it and informs the reader of a change in image and direction. But it should be one quote or the other. A brief preliminary sentence explaining it backed up by the quote would be good but try to avoid using the word "bubbly" twice as it is used in the quote. Vivacious is always a good alternative word to use

Shahid its FINE!! I only said about that because it appeared to be a quote again about her versatility, but I saw it was the one that already existed. Changing it puts it in its context, it doesn't increase POV in any way if I understand you correctly