User talk:Shshshsh/Archive 36

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Chak De! India

So you don't want to accept even comments on Chak De! India? You better watch "Believe in Me (2006 film)" --Mohanavel 13:07, 14 April 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohanavel (talk • contribs)

Andaz Apna Apna

I put citations next to Aamir Khan's name is because someone keep on switching between Aamir and Salman...So, i thought if i put citations they won't switch it...that's all...thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.222.243 (talk) 21:12, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hey, how are you doing?--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:07, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Life has been good and busy. Hardly editing these days. What are you up to these days?--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:39, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The Playback singer problem is here again...

Re your messages: I semi-protected the article again. The user is effectively banned, so there isn't much anybody can do about that. I filed another SPI report to check for sleepers. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: You're right. Sorry, I misread your message and the past protection log. I reset the protection. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:46, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Re your message: That account was picked up in the SPI sleeper check. If you ever run into any more sockpuppets, do feel free to file another SPI report. The CU are happy to sweep through these. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:25, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

You have been
page protection
.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Shshshsh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This must be a joke. The users I reverted with the rollback (Hereis the one1 (talk · contribs), Jacklion (talk · contribs), and the one whose revision still stands: Winner is Here (talk · contribs)) are the sock puppets of User:Dr.Mukesh111, who has been banned from WP and still keeps creating multiple accounts. All the socks I reverted are now blocked indefinitely. You can see the full report here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr.Mukesh111. The guy creates multiple accounts and reverts all the edits I do. You can turn to User:Gogo Dodo for further information.

I really think the blocking admin owes me an apology. He also took away my rollback rights without reviewing the case properly. This is really insulting. Shahid • Talk2me 20:24, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

My apologies, I hadn't realised there was socking going on. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:16, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, everybody makes mistakes. Shahid • Talk2me 22:32, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, this is simply why we have unblock requests - so that one can explain one's actions when they are not readily visible to someone :-) (
BWilkins ←track) 23:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

LOL Shahid your turn to be blocked!! How are you amigo? Have you sene Band Baaja Baaraat?♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:59, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nope haven't seen it, not my cup of tea, although generally I like Fincher's satirical sense of humor in his films. Yeah I think I'll go and see True Grit, much more my sort of film. A western these days too is pretty rare. What's Zinta up to these days?♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:42, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Preity Zinta doesn't strike me as the typical drug addict... I've started Dobara. Want to have a joint DYK on it?♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:01, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiry

I have gotten permission to use a publicity shot on Wikipedia but have no idea to what can I license it as. I would be very thankful if you could help me out, I uploaded it but it got removed immediately. Aryan1992 (talk) 22:48, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WRT "Will source it today."

As you are an established contributor I was surprised at your comment diff. Re-adding unsourced personal information in this way would normally lead to warnings for non-regulars. Is there any reason that you feel that the BLP policy should not apply in this case? Thanks, Fæ (talk) 10:05, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Barnstar

Thank you for the barnstar! It is an honor to be receiving one from you. =) I blocked the most recent socks and filed yet another SPI to look for sleepers. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:01, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:language scripts

Dear Shahid, I am still convinced that both Devanagari and Nastaliq scripts have a place in the article in light of my comments

here. Since the two of us are very hidebound in our respective positions, I feel the best idea is to have a group of neutral administrators evaluate the issue and then draw a conclusion on it. I hope this helps. Thanks, AnupamTalk 04:56, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

New message

Hey Shahid, remember how we wanted to start a discussion about adding other "notable" awards to an actor's filmography. Well, after thinking about this, I thought that this wouldn't be a good idea because it would increase the size of the article (I noticed this when I was working on Kapoor's article in my sandbox). Finally, I came up with

This is what you end up with. I am thinking of implementing this layout on other actors' award pages as well. What do you think? -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 19:33, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

I have formatted the awards page according to how it appears on List of awards and nominations received by Alicia Keys - that was my main motivation in creating a template for actors as well. Plus it doesn't really hurt to have a "brief" introduction about the award ceremony especially for those who don't have an article of their own. -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 16:38, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Christmas Shahid and Rahul!♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:59, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Same to you Blofeld... =) (P.S. Shahid you have written a really good intro to Preity's award page!!) -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 18:51, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I did. Do you see any mistakes? -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 20:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What about the "critics" awards from Filmfare, Stardust, etc? Those awards don't have nominations. Would we have to include them as nominations as well? -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 22:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Shahid it looks like all of the "Indiatimes" links are not working anymore and this problem has been occuring for a long time. At first I thought it was just a temporary thing but this isn't the case. :( This brings me to the question I wanted to ask you: Kapoor's article currently features a review of Chameli from Indiatimes (Subhash K Jha). Since the link doesn't work anymore, I was able to find the same review on "Glamsham.com". Do you think it would be okay if I changed it to that? -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 19:23, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how to find the archived version of a source. Can you please help me? -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 21:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks bud and BTW Happy New Year!! =) -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 20:18, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Akshay Kumar

All quiet there now, semi protected for three months. If an article receives a similar amount of ip reverts then it is better to request semi protection than to keep having the article disrupted and having to constantly revert it, its a shame but if all the unconfirmed ip accounts are doing is vandalism then what to do. Many thanks for your contributions in 2010 and best wishes to you and your families and friends in 2011, and you

Off2riorob (talk) 20:29, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Excuse Me

Who are some of the most famous Bollywood Actors? Also, will you please put the answer on my talk page--76.20.52.229 (talk) 23:42, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shania

NOOOOOOOOOooooo!!! Look how beautiful she looks though...♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

She really seems to go for German looking blokes with curly hair doesn't she!! This new bloke reminds me of Michael Ballack when he has longer curly hair. Not only is the guy stinking rich but has Shania for a wife and lives in Switzerland, one of the most scenic places on earth. So unfair!!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:06, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cutting down on the time I spend on wikipedia and allocating more time to things I have to gain personally...♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing recently. I was going to go and see The Tourist with Jolie and Depp but the reviews were awful...♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HELP!

Please go to the talk page for Udita Goswami ASAP. I edited the article with a valid source (a real interview) and a certain person keeps changing the article to his edit with unreliable sources. It's becoming really pathetic. AyanP (talk) 21:32, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Ayan[reply]


Dear Shahid! That certain person happens to be me. Do be kind enough to check the talk page for Udita Goswami as well as the talk page for AyanP. You are sure to notice the personal attacks that he has made on me with phrases like 'fool' and 'stop pushing your agenda' in addition to mocking my home state. I am glad the guy called for your intervention, I wish to do the same and would very much wish that you intervene. I haven't been involved in an editing war ever but I am afraid this is turning into one. Happy if you could help. Killerdove 04:46, 5 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killerdove (talk • contribs)

Katrina Kaif

Hi amigo, when you are on line could you have a quick look at the edit request on this BLP, my Hindi consists of hello goodbye and a few other useful phrases and numbers and I definitely can't read it or tell the difference between this dialect and that one thanks.

Off2riorob (talk) 18:50, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Please do provide sources

While the article contains references to awards she has won, I see nothing that supports this particular claim. [1]. Thank you for providing a source. Active Banana (bananaphone 20:21, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Shahid • Talk2me 21:23, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Baghban.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:19, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clint Eastwood

Hey buddy. This is currently going under GA review. I've condensed it down from 157kb to 86kb!! The GA reviwer said it must be below 60. I disagreed as if it is cut much below 80kb it will start to affect its comprehensiveness. Nehrams is going to do a little further cutting and imporvements later, it could still do with some copyediting. Zinta is currently 73kb so to expect Clint Eastwood who has been in films since 1954 to have an article below 60kb is a little extreme I think..♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know, and Changeling is 121 kb and a featured article, so an article on Clint's career at 80kb is quite good I think. Well,we'll see how it goes...♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:56, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And still Tony's grilling goes on and on. It really makes you think twice about bothering with GAs. This is easily the most fussy GA review I've ever encountered and I have over 60 of them. He expects it to be perfect and in all honesty don't think he has much experience with GA review, he's treating it virtually as an FAC. Wow google image Sarah Shahi....♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:27, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Most of his comments have been valid. But the article has near 300 references and it is way more comprehensive than most GA candidates.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:35, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Has Yellow Monkey retired? They hounded him and voted to remove his photo polls onto a sub page it seems and he has not returned since. He isn't answering his emails. What happened? Surely he is thicker skinned than that?? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

socks

Hi there. This is the second time in a month that you have marked someone that was asking me for help as a sock. First User:Taribhen and then suspected User:Rapidfire1. How do you know, how do you prove it, and how do they get blocked? What else are you working on these days? I am trying to moderate a couple of warring editors on Mallika Sherawat, but not having a great deal of success. Some people just refuse to compromise. Also, Sholay is sitting in the GA queue waiting for a reviewer to pick it up. BollyJeff || talk 02:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. If you get a minute, could you throw in your opinion on Mallika Sherawat? They say they want more editors to weigh in, but it may just be a stalling tactic. I think they just want to wear each other down. BollyJeff || talk 14:39, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. BTW, the recent edit to
Bollywood does not seem right to me. I am thinking the source meant Cinema of India as a whole. Bollywood alone does not make over 500 films a year. Cinema of India articles says it was 235 in 2009. BollyJeff || talk 17:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Re: Star Screen Award

No problems mate, I didn't see the awards so have no clue about it. Don't know why its not mentioned in the source but thanks for the info.--- Managerarc talk 19:18, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IP guy

This guy keeps making massive unwanted changes under 205.242.229.70, 205.242.229.69, and maybe more. BollyJeff || talk 21:37, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, User:Managerarc, thinks he is okay, see: User_talk:Bollyjeff#Re:_205.242.229.70 BollyJeff || talk 21:49, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is your view on

this? -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 17:41, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Over the past several years, I have noticed that an actor's win depends on the film's performance at the box office rather than his/her work in the film. If you were to take a look at the winners of mostly all the Indian award ceremonies, you would know what I'm talking about. This would explain how Shernaz Patel's performance in Guzaarish was completely overlooked and I do agree that she deserved the award. Frankly speaking, I thought Hrithik deserved the award over SRK. As for the Best Actress award, I have not seen Ishqiya & BBB (maybe if I saw them I would change my mind but out of the other 3 nominees I do think that Kajol deserved the award). Bebo's character in G3 is similar to that of JWM so if you liked her performance there, you would like her performance in G3 as well. -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 19:41, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bachchan

Its not a poor source, its the page of Kayastha community.Winston786 (talk) 16:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Forget it, I have added this as source.Winston786 (talk) 16:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed...

...you have having problems with a particular edit warrior, which you warned. Please note that he has been blocked here yet again. If you have problems again with him, please inform me or the Administrators. Thanks --SH 23:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Bachchan

Hi there, I just reverted you edits, I have added reference which is credible ie

Aishwarya Rai‎‎ etc, it get fairly enough coverage in Media. Hope this clarify the doubt, happy editing KuwarOnline Talk 12:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

I don't mind as long as the sources are up-to-date and it follows the required criteria. Not that if a person was born in a place where he currently also resides, his residence need not be added. Thanks, Shahid • Talk2me 14:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Bollywood Top-Grossing movies list

I agree with you. The copyright concern wasn't in the original AFD nomination, it was raised later only by the nominator. Now that the issue is with the copyright admins, nothing much can be done than to wait for their verdict. I don't know much about how

WP:NFC works but I'm sure the page will not be deleted. --- Managerarc talk 07:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Shahrukh Khan or Shah Rukh Khan?

Hi. What proof do you have that his name is 2 words instead of 3? Why not add some text with a source that explains why there is the discrepancy? Otherwise you will have to keep fighting this battle. You can't just says "it is so" without some proof. BollyJeff || talk 16:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you are saying about the burden, but the issue is not old to the new people that go on WP every day. A little prose explaining the situation would go a long way I think. How can it be that the spelling of the name of possibly the world's biggest star is not clear? BollyJeff || talk 17:05, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I do not agree with the other guy about the text. It was bad the way he wrote it. I know that there are lots of movies, books, etc. that have it either way. All I would like to see is the same thing that you usually ask for in articles: a RELIABLE SOURCE saying that his original name is Shahrukh, and maybe why it got morphed to Shah Rukh. If that exists, please add it. Didn't it come up in the discussion that you refer to? Can you point me to that? BollyJeff || talk 17:41, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Emailed!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shahid, when you have the time could you please help me find out the youngest winner and nominee for this table? Thanks :) -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 03:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Funny but it seems the average South Indian film article is better quality than the average Hindi film article these days, at least the older ones anyway... E.g Aarilirunthu Arubathu Varai vs Aap Beati...♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2000s Bollywood films are far better agreed. But pre 1990 Bollywood film articles on here are as bad as some of the Malayalam/south indian cinema articles we have on here. Sadly practically nobody seems interested in older Hindi films. I would love to see some GA articles on Nargis films etc... ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:50, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Yes its sad that we can't access decent info about some of the older films. We really ought to have more Bollywood GAs. Maybe info on some films does exist in biographies of Nargis etc. Info like this. Oooohhh check out this... . ♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:31, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! But I am attempting to compile material to develop Mother India into a GA class article, I've begun developing a themes section. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:22, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I noticed the copyvio notice and the deleted article in the template. It seems absurd to be that figures can be copyrightable. But the argument is "they are not actual figures but estimates". Its a bit extreme, but then Moonriddengirl is very strict in regards to possible copyvios.. I will try to get Mother India up to a GA standard although production notes I doubt I will be able to access. Mughal-e-Azam also intrigues me, you like it?♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:44, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that can go in the themes section for critical commentary... Its getting there. I think it could make GA without production notes as they don't appear to exist. We'll see after a few days of work on it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:25, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add a plot summary in a sentence or two to the intro of Mother India, just to cover what its about?♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:13, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. Mmm I did like the new poster as it really looks more like a 1950s classic film. OK no images and that later pink poster then it is..♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:14, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After a copyedit I think Mother India is ready for GA.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:18, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tell you who I like at the moment. Emily Blunt. Exactly my type, dark hair and blue eyes, classy, and a good sense of humour. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLNs69VezjI&feature=related.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

She's not "super hot" looking or anything but she's still gorgeous in my opinion. But it is her looks combined with her intelligence and personality which is exactly my type. Many "super hot women" lack qualities in the brain and personality department anyway!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:05, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm

Ana Vidovic or Emily Blunt....♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:02, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Colin Firth Best Actor, no surprise there.. Natalie Portman Best actress. She's very beautiful don't you think. Where did she get her looks?? Have you noticed how quite a lot of very average looking parents produce stunning looking children? Have you see Halle Berry's mother for instance? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:16, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here No, I wouldn't describe her as good looking. But then I think her extremely short hair and glasses don't help. She's OK , but pretty average looking if you consider how stunning Halle is. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:33, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re Madhubala images

Sorry about the re-revert. Have mentioned my reasons for wanting to change the image on the talk page. Regards. Ragasuran (talk) 17:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aishwarya Rai

Hi. Still awaiting my reply to the last post that I sent to you.

Sanjay911 (talk) 13:32, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Well, check out the improved page of Raavanan with extra reviews added. Both the reviews and the box office are extremely positive, at least more than Guru and Jodhaa Akbar. Check each and every review, plus the box office returns of both the movies and compare it to Raavana. It is better than them, both box-offce wise and reviews-wise. Sanjay911 (talk) 20:09, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 :Hi there, hope you are well. Still awaiting your reply to my above message. Thanks! Sanjay911 (talk) 21:21, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay thanks. She was invited by the Academy, so I added that part along with The Hindu's link and another direct video link where she herself confirms it. In the link you cited she was appreciated for her fashion sense so I added up that too.

Btw, this is kinda dumb but where is 'Raavanan's talk page so that I can put forward my argument? I know, dumb. But I'm new. So please help! Thanks! :)Sanjay911 (talk) 05:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PINQ

Hey, waiting for your adjudication on the

India Quiz -- Longhairandabeard (talk) 11:39, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shshshsh/Archive_36&oldid=1192074549"