User talk:Shunker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Shunker, and

welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Guiding Light
. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page
, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! AniMatetalk 21:26, 18 February 2009 (UTC) {{
helpme}} Two of my earliest contributions (adding external links to my library's web site) have been deleted. I'm wondering why.[reply
]

{{

helpme
}}The pages are still there, but my links aren't. They're in my contributions, but not on the pages anymore.

{{

  • (moved from my talk)

Shunker (talk) 14:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)shunker[reply]

About your...
"...adding external links to my library's web site"Shunker[1]
While I'm sure you mean well, your contributions([2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]) to wikipedia under Shunker, consist entirely of adding external links to http://.bgsu.edu and is considered WP:Spaming. Looking through your contributions as a whole, they all seem to be only adding bgsu.edu. Wikipedia is NOT a "repository of links" Avoid breaching those relevant policies. You're here to improve Wikipedia -- not just to add links to bgsu.edu right? --Hu12 (talk) 18:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • In response to your assertion that my adding external links is spamming, I do not agree. We are a non-profit institution that exists for our users, internal and external, and if we can lead someone to valuable primary resources in an academic library, I don't think that is spam. I have seen other external links that link to particular collections in libraries, why are mine any different? Why is it when I found out that my first two external links had been deleted, the person I asked about it didn't say they thought it was spam? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shunker (talkcontribs) 15:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Herin lies a problem;
  • "We are a non-profit institution that exists for our users..."Shunker[11]
welcome page
to learn more. You're here to improve Wikipedia -- not just to funnel readers off Wikipedia and onto some other site, right?
Here are the related rules;


  • SPAM
    • External link spamming
    • How not to be a spammer
  • External links policy
    • Advertising and conflicts of interest
  • Conflict of interest
    • Editors who have a conflict of interest
    • Accounts used for promotion
    • Law Of Unintended Consequences
  • What Wikipedia is not
  • Wikipedia:BLOCK#Disruption
    • Persistent spamming
    • Accounts that appear, based on their edit history, to exist for the sole or primary purpose of promoting a person, company, product, service, or organization in apparent violation of Conflict of interest or anti-spam guidelines.--Hu12 (talk) 18:34, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}After all of this, I still disagree with this one editor. I realize, as a librarian, that some users (researchers, students, etc.) use Wikipedia as a resource and may not know where to find primary source material. I was merely trying to let people know that we have these incredible primary sources here that they may not find anywhere else and I saw Wikipedia as a step in their research path. If that constitutes spam, then I give up. I will not be using Wikipedia as an option when trying to find out something or recommending it as an option for others. Do other editors feel the same as Hu12? If so, I'd like to see your policies rethought. I was not trying to spam and self-promote. We have resources that people can use. They are not a substitute for Wikipedia. Wikipedia does not have the same kind of information that we have. I'm done. I'm not sure I'm not being picked on for some reason and I'd like to see all of the other links to academic library collections checked as well. I hope someone other than Hu12 answers this call.

Please do not use help me for non-help related business. You're using this template to vent, and that isn't what we're here for. Have a great day. - Jameson L. Tai talkguestbookcontribs 19:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I did not mean to offend, but how do I vent or disagree? If the helpme template is the wrong way to do it, how do I? I need help with this, because I truly want to do the right thing here.
You couldn't find a way to vent on Wikipedia? If you have read the policies and guidelines on Wikipedia, you should abide by these policies and guidelines. If you want to suggest something, you can take it to
helpme}} template is only for you do get help, not to vent. If you need guided assistance, I suggest you go on IRC and there are channels where experienced editors may help you or may direct you to someone who can. #wikipedia-en connect, #wikipedia-en-help connect. - Jameson L. Tai talkguestbookcontribs 23:02, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Also, remember that editors and administrators are volunteers - just like you - to improve an encyclopedia. We volunteer to improve the encyclopedia, not to be your sponge for you to vent. - Jameson L. Tai talkguestbookcontribs 23:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]