User talk:Simon D M

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia as of June 2008.

The Socratic barnstar

The Socratic Barnstar
While engaged in a dramatic discussion over alleged
WP:NPA violations by a single-purpose account, you provided distinct and well-referenced responses to all attempted arguments in the Big Bluster Incident of Aught-Eight
. Your responses to counter-accusations were engaging, without veering into privacy violations, and kept the SPA running for new ground. Way to go, Master Debator!

--LeyteWolfer (talk) 05:00, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation

My apologies, I didn't see your earlier note. I suggest you seek the help of the Mediation Committee. This is a relatively narrow dispute between just two editors, so it is an excellent candidate for mediation. I would not be a good mediator for this topic. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 09:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your profile

Couldn't have said it better myself -

WP:DE has got you in one: "Disruptive editing already violates site policy, yet certain editors have succeeded in disrupting articles and evading disciplinary action for extended periods because their actions remain limited to a small number of pages and they do not commit gross violations of Wikipedia:Civility
. Collectively, disruptive editors harm Wikipedia by degrading its reliability as a reference source and by exhausting the patience of productive editors who may quit the project in frustration when a disruptive editor continues with impunity." Shame on you Simon D M for pushing your anti Sahaja Yoga agenda on Wikipedia.
Freelion (talk) 05:44, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? --Simon D M (talk) 09:20, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Simon D M/proposed structure for Sahaja Yoga during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy (Help!) 09:41, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

The MFD discussion has resulted in no consensus, which means that your page will not be deleted.--

the Orphanage 08:41, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Academic views on Falun Gong

What Wikipedia is not
").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

sign your comments
with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

articles for deletion
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a

talk) 01:06, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]