User talk:Simon D M

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia as of June 2008.

The Socratic barnstar

The Socratic Barnstar
While engaged in a dramatic discussion over alleged
WP:NPA violations by a single-purpose account, you provided distinct and well-referenced responses to all attempted arguments in the Big Bluster Incident of Aught-Eight
. Your responses to counter-accusations were engaging, without veering into privacy violations, and kept the SPA running for new ground. Way to go, Master Debator!

--LeyteWolfer (talk) 05:00, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation

My apologies, I didn't see your earlier note. I suggest you seek the help of the Mediation Committee. This is a relatively narrow dispute between just two editors, so it is an excellent candidate for mediation. I would not be a good mediator for this topic. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 09:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your profile

Couldn't have said it better myself -

WP:DE has got you in one: "Disruptive editing already violates site policy, yet certain editors have succeeded in disrupting articles and evading disciplinary action for extended periods because their actions remain limited to a small number of pages and they do not commit gross violations of Wikipedia:Civility
. Collectively, disruptive editors harm Wikipedia by degrading its reliability as a reference source and by exhausting the patience of productive editors who may quit the project in frustration when a disruptive editor continues with impunity." Shame on you Simon D M for pushing your anti Sahaja Yoga agenda on Wikipedia.
Freelion (talk) 05:44, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? --Simon D M (talk) 09:20, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Simon D M/proposed structure for Sahaja Yoga during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy (Help!) 09:41, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

The MFD discussion has resulted in no consensus, which means that your page will not be deleted.--

]

Academic views on Falun Gong

What Wikipedia is not
").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

sign your comments
with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

articles for deletion
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

]