User talk:Simonflai

This is Simonflai's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francesco Renna (May 9)

Articles for Creation

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ringbang was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Francesco Renna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ringbang (talk) 22:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Simonflai, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ringbang (talk) 22:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francesco Renna (May 11)

Articles for Creation

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's

Referencing for beginners

. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Citations should be formatted as per

WP:CIT

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Francesco Renna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:06, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Articles for creation

Articles for Creation

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Simon Flai (talk) 20:40, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, citations have been formatted properly :)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francesco Renna (June 10)

Articles for Creation

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not seem to meet

WP:MUSICIAN

. Note that ALL statements of fact must be sourced to third-party references, and you have none in the first 2 paragraphs of the biography.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Francesco Renna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 05:33, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Francesco Renna Draft

Simon Flai (talk) 22:08, 25 June 2016 (UTC) (talk)[reply]

Hello again [[User:LaMona], sorry about that, I will provide some information about the label. I have been reading the |Antonio Carlos Jobim| arcticle, as a reference they also use Discogs. Anyway, does AllMusic work? Thanks again!

Simon Flai, you can cite AllMusic for things like track lists, but because AllMusic covers ALL MUSIC it doesn't show notability. You will still need references that show that others have written about the subject. LaMona (talk) 22:15, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francesco Renna (July 11)

Articles for Creation

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More references are still needed to establish notability of the subject involved.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Francesco Renna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 17:32, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pasting

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's

paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:57, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:uai4Xj8MifAJ:www.sydneybands.com.au/solo-musicians/singers/alfredo-malabello/brochure/+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Spam and copyright infringement. Gah Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:57, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock

|reason=Hello Doc James, 
I'm really sorry about that. Alfredo Malabello's page was just a draft and I was guessing to edit it. My intention was not to copy and paste the article, but to edit Malabello's biography on Wikipedia without publishing it.
Maybe the software detected something wrong, but I don't think I was.
Please, let me know.

Simon Flai (talk) 11:10, 24 October 2016 (UTC)}}

. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You also need to disclose your relationship to the topics you write about. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:05, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have still not address my concerns about your COI. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:17, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Simonflai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

can I please be unblocked? I was sorry for the mistake with Alfredo Malabello's biography. Thanks.

Decline reason:

You don't address the COI concerns or adequately indicate that you understand the policies related to copyright linked to in your block notice. I must decline your request. 331dot (talk) 07:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.