User talk:Snowolf/Archives/201004

The {{blocked}} template needs to be subst'ed, also it's a bit old, don't think it's been used in years ;-) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 15:47, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

God you're a moron.. protecting the fundies... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.66.115.175 (talk • contribs) 14:46, 13 April 2010

Seriously... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.66.115.175 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 13 April 2010

Thanks for reverting vandelism on my userpage. --> Halmstad, Charla to moi 15:13, 13 April 201 (UTC)

homosexual —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.18.44.13 (talk • contribs) 15:19, 13 April 2010

gay? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.18.44.13 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 13 April 2010

gay? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.18.44.13 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 13 April 2010

Ciao Snow', tutto ok? :-) --Filnik ^dimmi! 20:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Su skype non ci sono spesso, è vero, su IRC ogni tanto mi connetto :-) più che altro ho ri-iniziato i corsi all'università e questo trimestre ne abbiamo tre e sto uscendo un po' fuori di matto perché ho un sacco di roba da studiare.. --Filnik ^dimmi! 14:06, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi. Sorry to come from nowhere like this, but could you please block User:87.127.166.231? They were given two final warnings a few months ago, and have now returned with exactly the same type of vandalism (this on Kassam Stadium). I saw you block a couple of vandals recently, so I thought of you when I noticed. Thanks. Alzarian16 (talk) 21:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! Rich Farmbrough, 03:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC).

yes it needs to be deleted also Ive tagged it--Steam Iron 13:19, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

eather way thanks--Steam Iron 13:21, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Snowolf, thanks for moved the article Hebe (television program) of talk to the article. Could you do me the favor of moving Category:Hebe Camargo of talk for article too? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.22.194.155 (talk) 17:43, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

I was attempting to make a legitimate edit on the Allen Swift page. I truly do believe it's a legitimate death according to these sources. http://www.cartoonbrew.com/classic/allan-swift-1924-2010.html#respond http://dave-mackey.blogspot.com/2010/04/allen-swift-1924-2010.html

It was even reported by Allen Swift's friend, Gene Deitch. I hope you understand, and sorry if it appeared to you that I was trying to vandalise Wikipedia. 71.23.49.33 (talk) 20:27, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

McClean is his surname. It is spelt wrong on his page as James McLean.

Please stop changing it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.117.233.224 (talk) 20:29, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Why do you insist on reverting it back to the wrong name?

Please answer without an automated response.

Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.117.233.224 (talk) 20:32, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Hey, thank you for responding.

Here is a source:

http://www.derrycityfc.net/cityweb/Match-Reports/three-is-the-magic-number.html

This is a match report from Derry City FC website, throughout the article it refers to him as James McClean, also in the team list at the bottom he is refered to as James McClean.

Here is another source:

http://twitter.com/derrycityfc/status/6044366225

This is from the Derry City FC twitter page about his proposed move to Lincoln which never occurred.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.117.233.224 (talk) 20:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, I look forward to resolving this issue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.117.233.224 (talk) 20:54, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Why is it "unconstructive" to mention that Schaffhausen is the birthplace of a very notorious war criminal? It is certainly not adding to the town's reputation, but it is a relevant fact about its history. Thousands of wikipedia articles about cities and towns include references to notable people who were born in the place, whether they were notable for good or for bad reasons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.178.98.188 (talk) 21:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC) [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.178.98.188 (talk) 21:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Honestly, I was just thinking about telling you about how you're doing a great job as well. Quite a team! =) Tommy²⁰¹⁰ 21:53, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello. I saw you reverted an edit by 74.96.5.26 (not me, btw), who had made a sentence read "Babe's brother, Henry (Roy Scheider), better known as "Doc", poses as an oil company executive but in fact is a U.S. government agent working for an agency headed up by Director Peter Janeway (William Devane) with whom he's also having a sexual affair." This seems to me quite correct - certainly early on in the film we see Doc on the phone talking to 'Jane' and pleading that he's missing him; and there are several other clues that there's a physical relationship between the two men (I seem to remember that the book the film is based on is more explicit). Perhaps it's a 'spoiler' in that when you first see the film it's only later that you realise 'Jane' is in fact Peter Janeway; but I thought I'd let you know as it seems a 'good faith' edit rather than vandalism - so perhaps you'll want to remove that notice from 74.96.5.26's talk page. Best wishes, Alfietucker (talk) 23:32, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

thks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trimble1 (talk • contribs) 00:59, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

never ever was such nation as Belarus, this entity first was created by russian empire after the total occupation and annexion of Lithuania in 1795, before this whole Belarus and Smolensk were Lithuanian nation and spoke the same language as Lithuanians, however religious language was russian-bulgarian language, which become Belarus language after anexion of whole Lithuania, that is why Smolensk now is using russian language and whole Belarus religious language...those fairytales about slavs settled in this teritory in 600 AD is just outrageous nonsence without any prove...moreover Ruthenians were Ukrainians and not Belarussians, that is why after theanexion of Ukraine by poland Lithuanian kings ceased to call themselves Ruthenian kings and left only Lithuanian (including Smolensk) and Samogitian kings —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.250.85 (talk) 01:10, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

it's pity that people still refer to slavic fascistic propaganda history sources...while even after the first partition russians planned to russify only Mogilev and Gomel like they did with Smolensk and other states including Minsk!!!! they left to Lithuanians as pure Lithuanian state, but later they wanted more and for 60 years even in nowadays Lithuania Lithuanian language was banned!!!! and if not Prussians and smuglers of Lithuanian books from todays Kaliningrad (Karaliaucius) Lithuania would be speaking like today's Belarus —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.250.85 (talk) 01:16, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

ur a faggot, fuck off and get a real job and stop fucking with my posts 8=======D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.160.212.24 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 19 April 2010

Sorry for reverting your page; I should have read the opening first. My bad. --

Thanks. This vandalism fighting is hard work. --

N419BH (talk

) 01:46, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

EVERY ARTICLE WITH SPOILERS NEEDS TO HAVE A WARNING OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.107.111.87 (talk) 02:28, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

...you get name-dropped in the vandalism itself! [2] ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thparkth (talk • contribs) 02:55, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Heh I know, ClueBot beat me to the revert by half a second. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 02:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

BITE MY DICK HAHAHAHA! YOU HAVE nO lIFE THATS WHY YOU EDIT PEOPLES GREAT IDEAS LOSER. SO PLEASE GO GET LAID OR SOMETHING BECAUSE IM SURE YOU HAVE NEVER EVER TOUCH A GIRL BEFORE P.S. WHAT KIND OF NAME IS SNOWOLF —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.68.219.66 (talk • contribs) 02:57, 19 April 2010

Moar caps pl0x. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 03:00, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi.

This account certainly merits a block but for tactical reasons, I would prefer that we not block it. The spammer is persistent and will just move on to new accounts, which will make tracking his/her spam harder than if they continue using this account.

Ultimately, blacklisting his/her domains is a more effective approach (see my comments at User talk:Kenneth131)

Can I ask you reconsider this block? Thanks! --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:56, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

It was me who made the edit. Forgot to log in. You read the fail-deadly article?! a fail-deadly device is an device which will ensure that the bomb will go off, even when the command structure is blown to kingdome come and that is what happended in the comic! Only because it's an ip doesn't mean that is bs per default!--Baruch ben Alexander - ☠☢☣ 17:21, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your tireless work submitting dozens and dozens of users to

Brace yourself, I just found a large cache of Peruvian spammers. --Calton | Talk 02:13, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Dear Snowolf, I am hoping you can help me please? I am looking for a writer to cover a couple of topics for me, for which I am willing to possibly pay. I wish to add a page about a person, not currently on Wikipedia, who started a business in the UK over 60 years ago, this of course will also mean creating a page on the current company and the group to which it belongs. I am looking for a nuetral writer for I understand that it needs to be written from a NPOV.

hoping you might be able to suggest someone who could assit me in this?

many thanks I look forward to your reply thanks Scott 81.175.5.205 (talk) 10:25, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Snowolf. You have new messages at Ilyushka88's talk page.
Message added 14:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ilyushka ☃^Talk!_Contribs 14:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

There are loads of conflicting articles online - but I'm thinking the anon editor is correct. Cheers SeanMack (talk) 16:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi Snowolf, I had earlier sent you an e-mail about my Toromont contribution. I realized I couldn't change my username so i opened up a new account with my personal name. I have made the changes to the Toromont wiki page again.

If you have any questions let me know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chad ming (talk • contribs) 18:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied to the email. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 23:02, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Is there anything you could contribute to Chad ming's talk page, or to Toromont that to shed light on the situation? He's quickly headed to a block for repeatedly adding copyrighted information, confounded by his coi. --

talk

) 18:52, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for your interest in igloo. I have added you to the script whitelist, so if you now try to run the program, it should allow you to connect. Any feedback is welcome etc. Ale_Jrb^talk 20:48, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, even more so because you're an admin from way back.

I'm very impressed with your edits. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 10:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

And again. Thank you. You'll undoubtedly get resistance, but it's worth it, if you believe this project is worth it. I think you do. Thank you for that. Shadowjams (talk) 10:10, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Deserve it --Extra999 (Contact me + contribs) 10:25, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

My edit was simply reverting ethnic vandalism. One editor insist on falsifying this man's origins. 123.211.210.83 (talk) 10:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I realised that and have since removed the country of birth, as it is disputed, even on teh various websites I have seen. Not a big deal. Cheers! 123.211.210.83 (talk) 10:48, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi, for future reference, I just wanted to point out that your edit to

For dealing with that Gucci008 spambot. PunkyMcPunkersen (talk) 22:23, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Please see, [3]. --Extra999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 10:27, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

I'd like to thank you for your counter-vandalism efforts, which have not gone unnoticed by me. I'd like to present you with this userbox to put on your page. It's part of a personal project. More userboxes at User: Deagle_AP/Fire Team Alpha. Deagle_AP (talk) 10:56, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm happy to stay an adopter, I'll just sit back and let them come to me, then I'll start editing for adoption things, as in teaching them. I'm still working with Ravenmewtwo, but more in real life, and on a mediawiki installation I set up for her. --Lcawte/WebCoder11 (^Ta_lk) 15:46, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello user Snowolf. You could tell me which user can help me build the Portal:Hebe Camargo? I need this portal to be ready as soon as possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.22.194.155 (talk) 16:46, 23 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.22.210.221 (talk)

Snowolf, thanks for moved the article Hebe (television program) and Category:Hebe Camargo, of talk to the article. Could you do me the favor of moving Portal:Hebe Camargo of talk for article too? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.22.194.155 (talk) 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Done, Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 08:16, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

I need help with editing and creating pages.See my cousin is the one who created the account and gave it up and gave it to me and i know lots of facts about my area of residence and gangs and every time i create a page or edit something it gets deleted or speedy delete nominated and I was wondering how i could prevent it in less complicated terms. --Bluecrip (talk) 20:28, 25 April 2010 (UTC)Bluecrip

Snowolf: thank you for your review of this page. We are not power users of Wikipedia - maybe you can help.

Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear is a prominent Intellectual Property Law firm - they have been involved in protecting many biotech and information technology innovations. They told us that many law firms have their own Wikipedia page noting historical milestones and achievements. We checked and found that to be the case: Orrick Herrington, Latham & Watkins, O'Melveny, etc etc etc. We assumed that notable law firms were therefore accepted as being a valuable part of Wikipedia reference information. We thought we could author something similar for Knobbe - we have never done a Wikipedia page before, but we know a lot about law firms - - so we thought we could probably do a reasonable draft. We have not completed this - we also thought we were in a "development sandbox" and we would not be reviewed until the content was finished. I think it is unfortunate if this important firm is blocked from being listed because the name of our firm has the word "marketing" in it. We are not trying to advertise the firm - we just think they have made valuable contributions and earned a place.

Maybe you can advise us of why other firms were not blocked and this firm is - and what we can do to solve this. If this is merely an issue about our own firm name: Bothwell Marketing - we can certainly have another person/company submit a listing. In the meantime we really would like to have this listing "unblocked" so we can continue to work on it.

I look forward to hearing your thoughts.

Anne Anne651 (talk) 20:30, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Hey there. I don't know if you're actually mentally retarded or just, I don't know, drunk, but would you stop reverting the Thomas Jones page when I delete massive chunks of random incoherent junk and completely failed HTML coding? I don't know if you think unintelligible gibberish looks 'cool', or something, but it's a bit annoying when mongoloids keep putting it back up on a page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.22.51.202 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 26 April 2010

You just reverted my edit to Ficus monckii (a species of fig tree). (I'm quite used to this, by the way.) What I am trying to do, in a lot of articles for species of Ficus, is to sort the alphabetization on the page for Category:Ficus. Right now, the species are following three different alphabets.

On Category pages for a genus, the usual practice--and the best way--is to sort them by the species name, the second part of the binomial (scientific) name. That is because almost all the entries themselves begin with the genus name, so if you just alphabetize them straight, the page is one VERY big letter. It is also important, then, to spell that species name with a lower case initial letter (as is the scientific convention, anyway). This is because on these lists you get, first, an alphabet by capital letters, then an alphabet by small.

The best genus Category pages are done by this system. And several people, including a few who had reverted me, have thanked me for my good work. 71.126.140.136 (talk) 21:59, 26 April 2010 (UTC)Stephen Kosciesza

You wrote: I see, is really {DEFAULTSORT:Fi|cus monckii} the proper format? I was puzzled by the |. In any case free free to revert me. Happy editing, Snowolf How can I help? 22:04, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Is that how I did it? If so, I got it wrong (although I thought I was checking for mistakes like that). For most categories, the ideal would be {DEFAULTSORT:Ficus monckii} taking special note to spell monckii with a lower case m. (That's because on the lists, Wikipedia will do Ficus A, Ficus B, Ficus C, etc., THEN Ficus a, Ficus b, Ficus c.)

For the Category Ficus, where almost all the items on the list begin with Ficus, I would put [[Category:Ficus|moncki]]. Then the list begins with an alphabet of capital letters for those few articles that are not specific species--and there follows a lower case alphabet for the list of species. 71.126.140.136 (talk) 22:11, 26 April 2010 (UTC)Stephen Kosciesza

Glad we've got it clear, because the explanation I just wrote you DID NOT come out they way I wanted. 71.126.140.136 (talk) 22:14, 26 April 2010 (UTC)Stephen Kosciesza

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Well, you seem to be almost unbeatable on Huggle, so I think that warrants a barnstar! Keep up the good work :) Orphan Wiki 22:32, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 23:40, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Because you (and cluebot) are consistently beating me. ;) stop being so damn fast! Tommy²⁰¹⁰ 22:43, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

That's why I've given up for the night... Orphan Wiki 22:53, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Enough for today for me -> http://www.snowolf.eu/files/2010-04-27%200123-09.png Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 23:29, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:55, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi snowolf,

I recently checked that the entry for Jejemon has been deleted. I know the wikipedia tried to educate the internet-dependent generation through its fast and accurate retrival of facts. I am somehow saddened that the Jejemon entry was deleted. If I am not mistaken, it was cited that it was gibberish or anything going to that direction. However, as part of the pop culture in the texting capital of the world, I believe the entry has every potential to be included in wikipedia. The entry does not discriminate anything from anyone. It tries to educate people of things that somehow bothers a huge fraction of the society. If LOL has its wiki page, I can't think of any reason jejemon shouldn't be having any.

Fotolocco (talk) 20:36, 28 April 2010 (UTC)fotolocco...

I tend to concur with Fotolocco, although yes I also understand that a jejemon article could quite easily degenerate into gibberish and into an attack page. If it's not up again by tomorrow and I have time, I'll try to come up with a wiki-worthy article for it, since I already have verifiable sources from Philippine and Southeast Asian print and television media outlets. That is, of course, pending any objections you might have about the matter. - Alternativity (talk) 04:07, 30 April 2010 (UTC)