User talk:Snthdiueoa

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Andy Beard

So why dont you help establish Andy Beard notablity for WikiPedia. Thank you, Igor Berger (talk) 03:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SYS AfD

Hey Snthdiueoa, I know what you mean about the homepage, but it's still not too nice to say it in front of him.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 23:16, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, guess you're right there... —Snthdiueoa (talk|contribs) 23:19, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sexuality and Space

Hey Snthdiueoa, I've made a large revision to the

Sexuality and Space article. It's very much not the article it was when it hit AfD and I'd like you to take a look at it and see if you feel differently about it now.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 02:27, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm not really interested, to be honest. —Snthdiueoa (talk|contribs) 09:14, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain more fully?

Thanks for voicing an opinion in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Adnan Muhammad Ajam. You wrote:

"There is no significant coverage of this individual in his own right in reliable secondary sources.

The discussion has been so busy that you may not have seen that I did address the question of whether the "Summary of Evidence" memos fulfilled the requirement of reliable, verifiable secondary sources. I asked readers to review WP:BLP/Noticeboard#Primary source, or secondary source? and WP:RS/Noticeboard#What constitutes an "independent third party source"?

I try my best to understand the positions of those who disagree with me. So, I would really appreciate it if you could review those documents, and explain why you do not regard the summary of evidence memos as reliable secondary sources.

Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 20:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]