User talk:Sobanhazarwi
August 2013
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 02:49, 12 August 2013 (UTC)How many blocks do you need to understand that you can not remove maintenance templates without solving the issues? Your alter ego has been removing those templates four times after your block and you once. Go one like this an a longer block than the last one will arrive soon. The Banner talk 21:57, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Abdul Ghafoor Hazarvi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Ghafoor Hazarvi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. kashmiri TALK 22:39, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Pasban Khatme Nabuwwat
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
A tag has been placed on
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
Nomination of Pasban Khatme Nabuwwat for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pasban Khatme Nabuwwat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pasban Khatme Nabuwwat (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Majlis Tahaffuz Khatme Nabuwwat
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page,
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by
The article Majlis Tahaffuz Khatme Nabuwwat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Single-sourced POV fork of Tehreek-e-Khatme Nabuwwat, with largely similar text. Conversion to redirect was reverted.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yunshui 雲水 08:56, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Majlis Tahaffuz Khatme Nabuwwat for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Majlis Tahaffuz Khatme Nabuwwat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majlis Tahaffuz Khatme Nabuwwat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yunshui 雲水 11:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Manaqib-al-Jalila for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manaqib-al-Jalila is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manaqib-al-Jalila until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yunshui 雲水 13:02, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Pasban-e-Khatam-un-Nabuwat
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
A tag has been placed on
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
]Disambiguation link notification for October 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mohammad Abdul Ghafoor Hazarvi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chamba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
October 2015
Please stop continuing to remove
Blocked indefinitely
Even though it's been two years since your last block, you show no change in your pattern of removing maintenance templates from articles and refusing to discuss the situation. As a result, to (1) prevent further disruption of the project from removal of templates and (2) require you to discuss the removal, I am revoking your rights to edit articles. You must enter into discussion here, including why you're removing the templates, to be allowed to edit. You will also need to demonstrate your willingness to comply with guidelines, including leaving the required templates in place, to be allowed to edit again.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 12:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)