User talk:Softvision
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
{{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Triplets Paradox
Hi, concerning your edits on
]- Reconciled - article deleted. Softvision (talk) 12:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Deletion of Triplets Paradox
I interpreted your statement on the talk page of this article as a good faith deletion request, and have therefore tagged the article for speedy deletion per
- I confirm this. My intention is positive. Softvision (talk) 12:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Triplets Paradox - User page
Article moved here : User:Softvision/Triplets Paradox
Discussion is welcome.
Softvision (talk) 17:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- I removed the section on Talk:Twin paradox linking to your Triplet Paradox. Please do not advertise your original research. Paradoctor (talk) 23:59, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Preview instead of many small edits
]
- I agree. OK. Thank you. Softvision (talk) 19:14, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Your recent posts
You seem to be advocating for inclusion of
Also, you've been asked before to take more care with previewing before you save so you don't flood the page history: please remember to do this. Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 02:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- As I wrote, these actions against my submissions are based on not understending the essence of my submissions and not understanding the importance of the content in these submissions. The only way to fight against not understanding is to explain, to teach, to learn and to extend knowledge. It is evident, that these actions against my submissions are subjective, and their intension is distinctly NOT to enable discussion and NOT to exhibit serious contradictions in informations published globally in specific Wikipedia articles. I consider this as a serious matter. If such state is actively supported, that represents degradation of specific Wikipedia content, controlled and censored by specific users. I do not think that this represents the Wikipedia comunity. This represents the user DVdm. Howgh. Softvision (talk) 11:26, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Softvision, this is an encyclopedia. The point is not to "understand the essence of [your] submissions" -- it's to be able to WP:verify the information in them. If you're putting your own research into the articles, then whether or not it is accurate, it is not acceptable here. Also, you were asked to stay off DVdm's talk page. If you can't comply with this, then you'll need to be blocked. Please don't make this necessary. Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 12:33, 5 November 2009 (UTC)]
- Softvision, this is an encyclopedia. The point is not to "understand the essence of [your] submissions" -- it's to be able to
Hello, Softvision. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SarekOfVulcan (talk • contribs)
- Softvision, if you continue to edit Wikipedia without responding to the complaint about you filed at WP:ANI#User Softvision on talk pages you may be blocked from editing. EdJohnston (talk) 16:16, 6 November 2009 (UTC)]
- Thank you for leaving a note at WP:ANI, but it falls short of what we expect. To avoid further criticism, you should promise to:
- Follow our policies
- Pay attention to the views of other editors when advancing theories on Wikipedia that do not enjoy majority support in the outside world.
- Follow
- You are expected to negotiate to get support for your ideas, not just broadcast them to unwilling listeners without waiting for feedback. You are entering a place that already has rules, and you are expected to follow them. EdJohnston (talk) 20:52, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for leaving a note at
MfD nomination of User:Softvision/Triplets Paradox
- Delete it. Softvision (talk) 22:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)