User talk:SouperAwesome
y helo thar!
Heya. So, yeah... couldn't find the info for my old Wiki account. Started a new one. >_>
Dominixis 07:32, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, SouperAwesome, and
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Also, about "TimeSplitters" references...
Good job creating that page; I just hope it will be able to stay up. Also, I feel it should reflect all of the TimeSplitters games instead of one. I feel doing so will be more relevant and perhaps increase its notability. ♣
- That's cool. I just wanted to suggest that maybe it should cover the whole TimeSplitters series instead of one game, like I stated above. ♣ Chat wit' me § Contributions ♣ 19:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC)]
Your welcome
As far what to do, the best advice I can give in this case is to ignore them. Since it's a dynamic IP address, they can't be permanently blocked, so you just have to keep an eye out and report further harrassment to an administrator. This kind of stuff can happen to anyone - I get regular weird harrassment from someone from the University of Cincinatti, and spillover from harrassment of another user. Just keep your chin up and
References to media in TimeSplitters Future Perfect
A "{{
Adoption
Hello, SouperAwesome! I see that you have expressed an interest in being
- Alrighty, sounds good! I've changed the tag on your page to reflect that. I see you've already gotten the welcome post on your talk page (scroll up) so I won't repeat that. Anywho, that's a really great place to start, and has a surprisingly large amount of good information. I'm new at this adoption bit, so I'm not sure what all to do, but feel free to leave any questions you have for me on my talk page, and I should respond within the day. Regards, --Milton 05:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Image
Hey, this how-to deals with 'Pedia - Commons images, which I think is what you're looking for. The thirteenth step deals with {{
- Glad to help. --Milton 05:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Poorly written articles
I'd use {{
Giggy Talk | Review 22:02, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Super Mario RPG lists
You asked why
Currently,
TTN believes the citations in the development and reception sections of the list of locations, books and magazines, are trivial sources. When I added that the 3D perspective of the game is reminicent of
Per Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus can change, I have offered five different reasonable, temporary compromises that might integrate my idea with TTN's.
- Go over the list of characters so we can delete non–notable characters
- Rename the articles by following the steps at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting potentially controversial moves.
- Cut down the geography section list of locations by cutting it into the regional maps the adventures use when traveling from one to another. I can get pictures and write the fair use rationals, and someone can cut down the text that has no citation and does not allude to other media.
- Write the concept and creation and reception sections for the list of characters
- Write the concept and creation section for the main article
TTN rejected my compromise because it still keeps the articles. I agreed I would consider a redirect, but Wikipedia:Article size does not allow that, since the list of locations is currently 82 KB long. Instead, I agreed to help cut down the geography section that is the bulk of the article, but TTN rejected that as well because TTN states, "I am not interested in working on the article in regards to improving it." and "get past this "having sources automatically means that this information is good" mentality." TTN states, "I don't think they have or will ever assert notability." I have replied with, "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, so if you don't think the articles will ever assert notability, we cannot yet know this, per Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#I don't like it.
Would you please take a look at
By the way, I also noticed you're in the Adopt-a-User program. ☺ User:Matthew Yeager is my adopter. Taric25 01:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Super Mario RPG lists
Hello, I'm leaving you this message, because I noticed your adoptee in the Adopt-a-user program recently edited
TTN believes the citations in the development and reception sections of the list of locations, books and magazines, are trivial sources. When I added that the 3D perspective of the game is reminicent of
Per Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus can change, I have offered five different reasonable, temporary compromises that might integrate my idea with TTN's.
- Go over the list of characters so we can delete non–notable characters
- Rename the articles by following the steps at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting potentially controversial moves.
- Cut down the geography section list of locations by cutting it into the regional maps the adventures use when traveling from one to another. I can get pictures and write the fair use rationals, and someone can cut down the text that has no citation and does not allude to other media.
- Write the concept and creation and reception sections for the list of characters
- Write the concept and creation section for the main article
TTN rejected my compromise because it still keeps the articles. I agreed I would consider a redirect, but Wikipedia:Article size does not allow that, since the list of locations is currently 82 KB long. Instead, I agreed to help cut down the geography section that is the bulk of the article, but TTN rejected that as well because TTN states, "I am not interested in working on the article in regards to improving it." and "get past this "having sources automatically means that this information is good" mentality." TTN states, "I don't think they have or will ever assert notability." I have replied with, "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, so if you don't think the articles will ever assert notability, we cannot yet know this, per Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#I don't like it.
Would you please take a look at
According to
I see. Thanks, I hadn't known about that! SouperAwesome 10:04, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Reverting my merges
Why did you revert the Whispy Woods and Dyna Blade merges? - A Link to the Past (talk) 16:13, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- There were no specific discussions on merging these articles, but there were for other Kirby articles, and I used those to merge these. Anyway, looking at Dyna Blade, she's only in a couple games and the anime, certainly not significant enough to warrant her own article. - A Link to the Past (talk) 16:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair to Midland
It's okay! Don't worry about it. XD FallenWings47 7:14, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Should vs. Must
WP policy allows you to blank the page after you have read the messages and there is no obligation to archive. Please do not alter my talk page again. Thanks. Bluefield 12:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi
Hi there! I just want to let you know that your adding of electronica could be wrong. As the album only has elements of electronica, I would consider it a sub-genre. So I am taking it off. That's all, pretty minor issue. Anyways I'm deciding on putting this expanded version of Hybrid Theory up as an
- – The style of music is generalized as nu metal. As I can also comprehend, not every song in there is nu metal, thus the inclusion of alternative metal. As for electronica, just because things such as electronic drums and synth sounds are in their songs, it does not classify as electronica. I'm a fan of the ]
– As I mentioned before: thus the inclusion of alternative metal. Thanks for understanding! (SUDUSER)85 13:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
– You didn't comprehend me? I stated: “As for electronica, just because things such as electronic drums and synth sounds are in their songs, it does not classify as electronica. I'm a fan of the Nine Inch Nails and they have alot of the elements in their songs too. But they're not electronica.”
Every band out there has probably used electronic instruments in the songs at least once! The can only be really classified as electronica if their songs are electronic drums, keyboard loops and synth sounds from start to finish. It is common for rock bands to electronic instruments, okay? I hope I made this clear, I know this is a heavily dubious topic between many, but that's the way it is. The are rock bands if guitars and drums dominate their songs. So, can we end this? (SUDUSER)85 14:13, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
– The loops are nothing. If you want to see a difference, listen to songs by
– I did mention that in the Songs section about the electronic elements. Couldn't find solid refs for Cure for the Itch though. That's too bad. I hoped that the copy of Rolling Stone from 2002 had something. But it had nothing. (SUDUSER)85 14:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Remade songs
Hey there! I think instead of creating a separate section for remade tracks, it would look better being interpreting the data in to the “Recording and production” section. The reason is it doesn't have many sources to back it up. The fact that I actually found that “Complete Linkin Park discography” ref was a fucking milestone. I would like you to help me with it. Oh, the first review is up at Hybrid Theory's PR! Take a look to see what the javascript program has highlighted, that's what I'm doing. (SUDUSER)85 14:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- —And also some of the info in the "Remade tracks" section incorporate the info I already added in the "Recording and production". For example:"The Hybrid Theory demo CD that was sent to record companies also included several early versions of Hybrid Theory songs," "In some cases, the songs were almost completely rewritten, keeping few of their original elements." et cetera. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Suduser85 (talk • contribs) 14:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- —On second thought, the info isn't needed at all. The article already states that the tracks on the album were re-recordings of songs from the demo tapes. Too much detail isn't needed in my opinion :-) (SUDUSER)85 15:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
remade
Interpreting the individual names of the tracks on the demo and signifying which tracks on the album they evolved to is definitely too much unwanted info. I mean you don't see
- This line simply states: ““Xero” released one sampler tape which never surfaced into the mainstream.”
- I have a strong feeling that should be enough.(SUDUSER)85 14:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- No, I think that what's mentioned in the short sentences is enough.(SUDUSER)85 15:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not demonstrating article ownership or being immature. I'm just saying that because no one has any liable refs that can actually say more about the Xero demos. I am in no way demonstrating "article ownership". I don't believe in that sorta crap, articles are for anyone, just like candy :-) I've been searching "Xero" on Yahoo! for more than three fucking months! They're an independent band, LP is the major label artist. (SUDUSER)85 15:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Man, you're one hell of a fast typer :-) OK fine, I guess I was a little harsh to revert every single thing you added. I guess I goin' fucking crazy over this whole FA thing, I accept your apology and I too apologize. Hey, anyways I'm still waiting for that copyeditor that Xihix told me about. (SUDUSER)85 15:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC}
- I'm not demonstrating article ownership or being immature. I'm just saying that because no one has any liable refs that can actually say more about the Xero demos. I am in no way demonstrating "article ownership". I don't believe in that sorta crap, articles are for anyone, just like candy :-) I've been searching "Xero" on Yahoo! for more than three fucking months! They're an independent band, LP is the major label artist. (SUDUSER)85 15:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- No, I think that what's mentioned in the short sentences is enough.(SUDUSER)85 15:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
LEAD
Do you think we can do more for the lead section? I asking because the
Crocs
DragonForce
hey man i noticed you supplied the picture for the Dragonforce show. i was wondering if you had anymore photo's from that show i was there too! didn't score any myself unfortunatley.
well hit me back if you can help me out
User:Carbonatedwater User talk:Carbonatedwater 10.28pm 15 Janruary 2008
Can we please wait on adding this new stuff until it gets coverage in secondary sources? Trust me, you want to hear this coming from me as opposed to someone else, and it will come from someone else, if not now, then later. We want this article meticulously sourced, and to avoid primary sources as much as possible, to make everything in the article as cited/sourced/iron-clad as possible. Remember, the YouTube link may or may not be permanent - but citing secondary sources, whether or not the links online go dead - are permanent. Someone can always go to a library and look up magazine archives, you can't really do that with YouTube vids after they are removed. Best to write this article, from the start so it is the best it can be. Cirt (talk) 13:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hi there. I put a message on the article's talk page and saw your message on my page after I saved it. Check it out :) SouperAwesome (talk) 13:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
As you're the one who's made the changes, what is your source for Flogging Molly's Dave King & Bridget Regan actually tying the knot, and that Regan is taking King's name? Thanks. All I'm able to find on the subject is a Livejournal post regarding the WP changes and a widely distributed Associated Press article from mid-March referring to Regan as King's "eventual wife" neither of which are proof. Adding the source would be much appreciated, thanks! Salamurai (talk) 03:48, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hey there! Actually, I'm afraid I don't have an external source at the moment. I was at their show in Melbourne on Friday the 11th, and Dave said they were married "4 days ago in Tokyo" and that "it's Bridget King now!" I did a quick search around when I added it but didn't see anything. SouperAwesome (talk) 05:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Hybrid Theory is not hip hop
The album is not hip hop get it throug your freaking head. It's rap metal. --
LEARN YOUR GENRES PLEASE
Enough said.--SilverOrion (talk) 12:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Bridget Regan
A
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the