User talk:Southernlegal

RE: your recent edit on Curse of Ham ([1]); nothing inherently wrong with it other than the citation template used. We actually have specific templates for citing Bible references. Using those is preferred rather than using the book citation template. Generally, it's best to use this: {{Bibleverse|Genesis|1:1|KJV}}. See Template:Bibleverse for the template and its various parameters. ButlerBlog (talk) 19:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Historical reliability of the Gospels, you may be blocked from editing. tgeorgescu (talk) 15:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

my apologies. I provided commentary on the reasons why I removed portions of content on the Historical reliability of the Gospels and Sanhedrin trial of Jesus and thought those were properly explained. What would be proper explanations for removing page content so I know for future reference? Southernlegal (talk) 15:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia kowtows to the academic mainstream. All the rest are details. tgeorgescu (talk) 15:54, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]