User talk:Sowhatchawant

Hello, Sowhatchawant, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! GiantSnowman 11:52, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Whoa.THIS is AWESOME! Thank you GiantSnowman (talk) 07:01, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't tagged the article as spam or promotional; you might want to ask MrSpankie (talk · contribs). Further reading can be found at WP:ADVERT. GiantSnowman 11:53, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated for the assistance.Sowhatchawant (talk) 07:03, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

]

It's not "spammy" and backed up with credible sources. I'm asking other users to step in based on your disruptive history.Sowhatchawant (talk) 19:57, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[[1]] I don't have the time or patience to deal with people who are dishonest or attempting to use the website to publicize an entity you can state why I'm wrong at that board but it's pretty obvious by your editing history why you are here.

]

Those are strong accusations and very uncalled for. Everything in the article is backed up with sources.Sowhatchawant (talk) 20:17, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd refer you to

talk) 20:18, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Hopefully someone with authority will put an end to your disruptive edits and behavior. It's extremely uncalled for.Sowhatchawant (talk) 20:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

]

Talkback

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 06:23, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's so cool. How do you do graphics like that? Where would I find the graphic templates to add to like my user page?Sowhatchawant (talk) 08:44, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

talk) 08:59, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

As promised, I've looked it over, and have given my thoughts at

templates, and not any skill of mine! I'm horrible with graphics. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 03:49, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Your dispute with Hell in a Bucket

There have been some problems with your editing, but I am very unhappy with the way that Hell in a Bucket has dealt with them. I have contacted a member of the arbitration committee about my concerns, as you can see here.

You need to be aware of Wikipedia's policy on

. If you find one or more other editors disagreeing with you, it is considered unconstructive to just keep repeating your preferred edit, in the hope that the other editor(s) will eventually give up and let you have your way. If we all did that, the result would be that the most stubborn editors would finish up getting their way. Much better is to discuss the issues, and explain the reasons why you think your version is better, with a view to trying to reach agreement, or at least a compromise which everyone can settle for. If an editor does continue edit warring, he or she may be blocked from editing to prevent disruption.

One more thing. Have you previously edited from any other account? In particular, are you the person who previously used the user name "Pearljambandaid"? If not, what is your connection to that person? The editor who uses the pseudonym "

]

Thanks for the explanation and help. I understand what you are saying. I've never been in a dispute with anyone so I don't understand the process yet of how this all works. A lot to wrap your head around with Wikipedia and it's not as easy as it seems for a rookie. This is the only user name and account I use. Over the course of many years I have made edits "minor edits" from unregistered accounts on unrelated articles. I couldn't tell you how many but I have on occasion fixed typos and made mild edits. Before this account was made I would guess that I had probably made not more than 20 minor edits over my lifetime give or take.Sowhatchawant (talk) 18:07, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I still believe you are connected to the company either through PR or a paid editor scenario but I do at least owe you an apology for one thing "The iTunes release of “Let’s Take It Naked,” a flute-infused, bubble-gum dance-floor jam, is expected soon, along with a music video and radio promotion from distributor Caroline Records (a division of the very big deal Capitol Music Group)." [2]. Both times I researched this the first afd and this I searched Universal, Umg and Capital music. I searched using just cap this last time cause I was going to rip you for it here and I found Capitol. FUCK, that did make me feel like an asshole and made me look like an idiot to boot.

talk) 07:54, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

User is Jonathan Hay so he is both PR and member of the company. Good call on that one. (Sherwoodstu (talk) 22:46, 8 November 2014 (UTC))[reply]

]

Sockpuppet investigation

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SMH Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMH Records (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

]