This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments. The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Talk:Vladimir Lenin, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. RolandR 00:02, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
Srazin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did nothing to deserve these arbitrary and corrupt actions to be taken against my account. Why wasn't the person calling me a "vandal" banned indefinitely for violating policy? These actions really just how bankrupt Wikipedia is in terms of credibility.
Decline reason:
When you were banned as User:Jacob Peters, you lost the privilege of editing Wikipedia. Because you are under a community ban, and not a simple block, administrators do not have the authority to undo a block on any account you are using. If you think you've fully solved the problems that led to your ban, you can follow the instructions at the end of User talk:Jacob Peters to appeal the ban, but since you are still creating sockpuppet accounts, I don't think the problems are indeed fully solved. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:25, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.