User talk:Srikanthcsn
November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Iyengars, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.
- Please use block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: talk) 21:15, 18 November 2010 (UTC)]
Speedy deletion nomination of Sripad Sri Vallabha
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
A tag has been placed on
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Yoenit (talk) 11:43, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Duggirala Gopalakrishnayya, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.ongoleinfo.com/andhraratna.php.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not
The article PVN Acharya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Limited citability in GScholar, no other evidence of satisfying WP:BIO
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nsk92 (talk) 01:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Please see my comments on the talk p. of the above article, about whose accuracy I am considerably puzzled. DGG ( talk ) 00:44, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
We have the practice WP:LIST that we do not include individuals in lists such as this unless they either have a Wikipedia article about them, or the information given indicates that such an article is like to be supportable. I am accordingly removing a number of unlinked people. I am starting with those where there seems to be no information at all. Please feel free to re-add them after articles have been written DGG ( talk ) 00:51, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
PVN Acharya
I would like to thank you for creating the page on PV Narasimh Acharya, who happened to be my late father. I believe you copied/pasted what I wrote under Telegu Brahmins, or List of Brahmins, Contributions to Society. Unfortunately, there are guys on Wikipedia who can't resist finding excuses to delete the information and the significant contributions that Indians/Indian Americans have made. (RaghuVAcharya (talk)) —Preceding undated comment added 18:58, 15 February 2012 (UTC).
Nomination of PVN Acharya for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PVN Acharya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PVN Acharya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
October 2012
Hello, I'm
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current