User talk:Sslatt

Sslatt, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sslatt! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

19:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jim Joseph (February 24)

Articles for Creation

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jim Joseph and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:03, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jim Joseph (March 5)

Articles for Creation

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

I happen to notice this is not yet solid and several of the listed sources are simply press releases, focus with in-depth third-party sources overall, if available.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jim Joseph and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:35, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jim Joseph (March 11)

Articles for Creation

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

All that I can find in the references (and I looked at most of them) are mentions or quotes, which, by definition, do not support notability. The section on his writings is overly promotional (using promotional quotes, not unlike back of the book blurbs which are supposed to increase sales). However, the marketing book(s?) appear to be held in >1K libraries, so perhaps more emphasis on his writing would help. There is also a lot here,especially his bio, that is not referenced, thus making those "thin air" writing, and show that the editor has a source that is not being referenced or cannot be (e.g. the subject himself). The references "about" him are not third-party - his company, his profile on HuffPost, etc. Given his position it does seem that there should be better references, but unless they surface, notability isn't established.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jim Joseph and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 21:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jim Joseph (April 30)

Articles for Creation

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

Reads like a cv and looks like a case of

WP:BOMBARD

. This should be condensed to what is critical about this person, I see no reason for an article about this person to be longer than a stub paragraph if it should exist at all.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jim Joseph and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 20:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jim Joseph (May 12)

Articles for Creation

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Delta13C was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

References do not support notability. Many are from press releases. The Reuters article about Budweiser Superbowl ads only quotes him once and does not provide in-depth coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jim Joseph and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

talk) 10:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jim Joseph

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Jim Joseph, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See
Wikipedia:FAQ/Business
for more information.
It is a rejected submission at
section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. DGG ( talk ) 09:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply

]