If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon }}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor 04:31, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
What Wikipedia is not
").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
sign your comments
with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the
articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.
BJBot (
talk ) 20:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot . I have performed a web search with the contents of Central New Mexico Correctional Facility , and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.prisontalk.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-82489.html . For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on
talk) 03:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
I just don't think I can keep up with the atmosphere of the place here. It's too confusing. --Steve (talk ) 03:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
I know it's been many years, but, just keep in mind "put things in my own words" and it will avoid copyright infringement notices WhisperToMe (talk ) 03:32, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[ reply ]
You added the {{
Otter Creek Correctional Complex article — which indicates that a request by the article creator for deletion. The article history shows that you are not the article creator — rather it was created by
User:W.marsh , thus the tag is incorrect.
If for some other reason, you feel that the article needs to be deleted, please review Wikipedia:Deletion policy . Thanks.
— ERcheck (talk ) 04:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
This whole website seems to have become more pointless and unfriendly. Why bother? It's like everything elese in American Society - dense, bureaucratized, political, unfriendly.--Steve (talk ) 08:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
Yes, I know.
No, I am a guest here. No, Wikipedia does not belong to me. Yes, if I don't like it, I can leave. I understand.--Steve (talk ) 08:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
ttonyb1 (
talk ) 04:12, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Sorry, I forgot how much it sucks to submit here.--Steve (talk ) 04:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hi, Steve! I caught this edit back in 2008
I don't mean to be nitpicky, but I realize this is a copyvio: http://www.cca.com/facility/san-diego-correctional-facility/
2008 archive page: http://web.archive.org/web/20080112043607/http://www.correctionscorp.com/facility_detailed.cfm?facid=105
WhisperToMe (talk ) 03:30, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
]
I am now a fan. I hope you don't mind my reprinting your "Preterite" talk post from 2013.
https://www.facebook.com/notes/john-hicks/reason-vs-wikipedia/10156745196177388/
Frappyjohn (talk ) 07:46, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hello, SteveofCaley. Voting in the
2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page . MediaWiki message delivery (talk ) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]