User talk:Suduser85/Archive 2

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our

Thanks for uploading Image:Aydos.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bhcityseal.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Blackmail logo 2.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

Well, the star's there now;) Thank you for your congratulations! Gocsa 09:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

I have tagged

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:55, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Reply

Should be page 910, but could be a page or two off, as I manually calculated it. The online page is still there, but the the page numbers that were next to the albums seem to be gone... ✗iℎi✗(talk) 21:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Good job man! I looked through it, and it looks great. I feel somewhat honored you use

WP:FAC, and good luck! xihix(talk

) 03:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

It usually takes a few days. In my case, the reviews that were given were not much helpful, so I just forgot about it, and it got archived by itself. I then went off and got a friend of mine to do some copy editing and I nominated it for FAC. xihix(talk) 22:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

The person who copy edited Dookie for me was Golbez, though I'm not sure if he'll have the time right now. You can try asking him, though. xihix(talk) 21:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Hybrid Theory

It's getting there, but I don't think it's at featured article status just yet. I really feel electronica needs to be mentioned as one of the genres, as every single song on the album contains electronica, whereas, for example, not every song contains nu metal (Cure for the Itch, Pushing Me Away, as well as My December and High Voltage on the special edition). I've also read several reviews that mentioned that LP's difference to other nu metal bands was the more prominent electronica. Also, I'm pretty sure Crawling wasn't a Xero song - its original incarnation was a Hybrid Theory demo. Forgotten and Runaway began as Xero songs, however.

The article is certainly a fair bit better than it was, though. SouperAwesome 13:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

"Cure for the Itch" is nothing but electronica though, and "My December" from the special edition may as well have been written by Depeche Mode. Most of the songs shift from almost complete electronica in the verses into "metal" choruses. The only purely nu-metal songs would be "Papercut," "One Step Closer," and "A Place For My Head." SouperAwesome 13:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

But alternative metal doesn't include the electronic elements at all. As I said, "Cure for the Itch" is a purely electronic song, containing no guitar. "My December" contains a couple of very soft acoustic notes in the background of the chorus, and is otherwise also purely electronic. "High Voltage" contains almost no guitar until the end, when it just buzzes. I understand that one song (if "My December" and "High Voltage" are not counted as they are only on the special edition) is not enough to categorise the album, but all of the songs, every single one, contain the same electronica in the verses, and often also through the choruses. SouperAwesome 13:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

I understand, but every song on the album DOES use loops from start through to finish, and the songs I mentioned don't use the metal elements at all. SouperAwesome 14:16, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

I realise that Linkin Park are not an electronica band, and that Hybrid Theory is primarily a nu-metal album, but the huge electronic part of the sound on Hybrid Theory should be listed afterwards. SouperAwesome 14:35, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

The RS review mentiones "a Jones for Depeche Mode." The VH1 reference and the Sputnik review both mention the electronics, too. The Rythm interview reference and Popmatters review mention also, but call it techno. SouperAwesome 14:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC) Just as a side note, do you think we should copy all this discussion to the album's talk page?

Sorry I didn't respond to your copyedit request earlier/in time to do it for the PR, but I'm sure they helped too. I'll try to do a little bit today. ---- Golbez (talk) 20:49, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:In the End.ogg

Thanks for uploading

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Remade

Yeah, I kind of agree. It did seem like a bit much... I'm not sure though. Perhaps the songs that are from the Xero days should probably be given a sentence at least. How about that? SouperAwesome 14:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I was thinking of a sentence in the song section about how two of the tracks from the Xero tape evolved and were eventually used for Hybrid Theory. SouperAwesome 14:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I was harsh. I apologise. Please though, try to be a bit more reasonable. You're reverting every edit I make and saying "no. Please understand :)" to all of my messages. SouperAwesome 15:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Carlos Ebelhaeuser.jpg

Thanks for uploading

first fair use criterion

in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to
   di-replaceable fair use disputed
   }}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our

High on a tree

16:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Reply

No problem, it was a fun ce :-)

Anyways, if you need copyedits in the future, please don't hesitate to shoot me a message (but do put in a request at LOCE). It was great working with you on this one.

Regards, Malachirality (talk) 17:09, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

WP:WLA

This user wants you to join the Los Angeles area task force.

(♠Taifarious1♠) 02:50, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Sound files

Hi, what browser are you using and do you have an example of a page in which they do not appear correctly? Also, I've noticed you blanked your monobook.js. Does that cause the media boxes to line up correctly?

(Talk)

17:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. It might be something to do with your preferences. Please could you give the name of a page where they appear correctly logged out but incorrectly logged in?

(Talk)

16:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

I was unable to see a difference in the positioning when logged in and out. Please could you give the name of a page where both the text and the play button look wrong when logged in, so that I can look at which template it is and how it's being used.

(Talk)

17:17, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I think what it could be is that they are supposed to look like that. In this edit, the template was changed to add padding to the text directly beneath the play button, which meant that there was a small amount of space above, below, left and right of the text. The small amount of space to the left of the text is the reason why it is slightly off the margin.

The reason why it looks different logged in and logged out is because when you're logged out, you see a cached version that is out of date for performance reasons. You would therefore be seeing the old version without the padding.

(Talk)

17:49, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

I've now fixed the {{

(Talk)

00:02, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Guitar-hero-logo.png)

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

talk

) 00:49, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Will look

I will look at the article tomorrow. Good luck with it! xihix(talk) 06:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CK Calvin Klein.png

Thanks for uploading

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Zedla (talk) 17:40, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

FAC

Sorry about that..i meant that the lead didnt sufficiently address the nature of the music of the album; wasnt it a revolutionary rap rock/nu metal album, with presence of 2 different vocalists (one rapper, the other a rock vocalist) etc..

Anyway, the main (maybe only) reason for my strong oppose is that you have used non-reputable sources and fan sites to cite a lot of the info, like: songfacts, fofeit the game, LP association etc... Indopug (talk) 12:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Fine, no problem Indopug (talk) 13:56, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

An error according to the Manual of Style - hybrid theory and rock sound (in accolades section) need to be in italics... thats all. also, what is the basis of the order of the accolades table? i think chronological would be better. also remove the overlinking to US and UK in that table Indopug (talk) 14:52, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Can you please clarify this remark? Are you asking that the FAC be withdrawn? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:58, 29 December 2007 (UTC)