User talk:Suraya90

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Human Rights Activist from Detroit, Michigan. Enjoys fighting for human rights, especially the rights of women and children.

Suraya90, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Suraya90! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

talk) 16:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

@DORD

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Suraya90 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your block of my account is unjust and I would like it reversed. I am abiding by Wikipedia policies. I should be given a probation period and if I do not abide by Wikipedia policies, then I can understand blocking my account.

Decline reason:

You're blocked for checkuser confirmed sock puppetry. PhilKnight (talk) 13:20, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:PhilKnight Can you tell me how I can report user C.Fred? This editor has a personal point of view on a particular issue (please see the Chaldean Catholic Church and Chaldean Christian pages) and he keeps reversing any edits which disagree with him and he keeps protecting these pages in order to enforce his point of view on who members of the Chaldean Church are. Members of my Chaldean community are providing sourced material from Chaldean Church leaders as to who the members of the church (in terms of what is their ethnicity); yet, C.Fred keeps removing sourced and credible material because it does not match his personal point of view. Who is in a better position to declare who its church members are than a church's own leaders? I believe C.Fred is abusing his power on Wikipedia and is behaving in an unethical manner. How can this behavior be reported? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suraya90 (talkcontribs) 17:13, 17 February 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

evading this block and the blocks on any other accounts and/or IP addresses you may have in place. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 18:04, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

User:DoRd User:C.Fred It is apparent that C.Fred and you DoRd are the same person or have the same interest in trying to vandalize all Chaldean pages with your own personal point of view and not allowing others to make constructive edits to those pages. These pages have been taken over from the Chaldean Church by you anti-Chaldean bigots and you are abusing your power at Wikipedia to constantly vandalize these pages and block anyone who tries to update them with accurate information. The chaldean church members are proceeding with reporting C.Fred. I am one of the attorneys working on this case, on behalf of the Chaldean community, and it is my life mission to bring down bigots such as you. We also have a team of technical people working on helping us gather evidence regarding this situation. There is no place in 2015 for you anti-Chaldean bigots.

They are not checkuser confirmed socks, you are. This has nothing to do with your religion, you were block evading. Weegeerunner (talk) 23:35, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]