User talk:Svrznik
Speedy deletion nomination of Joe Dispenza
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
A tag has been placed on
deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Dispenza
. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
here. Celestina007 (talk) 17:16, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
]
- So, there's not really much of my "judgement" involved in this. What was said about the 2010 article still completely applied to the new article, and so I'm really just working as a functionary. If you're interested in writing an article about him, it may be possible, but you would need to publications about him by third parties with good reputations for fact checking and the like - the usual inclusion criterion for Wikipedia is explained this guideline on writing style - very basically, Wikipedia articles should be written so that everyone would agree on what's written (this is usually done by ascribing non-consensus views explicitly to the people who hold them), and so the balance of emphasis reflects the balance of emphasis in the sources. Wikipedia:Teahouse is probably the best place to pose questions. Cheers, WilyD 05:52, 7 January 2020 (UTC)]