User talk:TARDIS Builder

Promotional username inquiry resolved.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:46, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request. TARDIS Builder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: This username was not meant to be promotional -- it's a Doctor Who reference. The TARDIS is a time machine. But it seems that "gives the impression" is the pertinent phrase here; as such, if an admin would still consider this in violation of the policy (and I did read the username policy page, but it's a lot), let me know and I will change it, no problem. TARDIS Builder (talk) 17:30, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] Accept reason: Username accepted by blocking admin. -- "talk" 22:54, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply ] I am an admin based on the same side of the pond as yourself, and am therefore familiar with the acronym. I have expressed to the blocking admin my wish to unblock you, but it is rude for me to do so without her agreement. Please bear with us for a short time. -- "talk" 17:44, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply ] The reason I did it was because there's a website with that name, http://tardisbuilders.com/ . If you are not affiliated with that website I will unblock and you can carry on with this username. If you are, the username must be changed. Sorry for the delay. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:55, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] Hi Diannaa, I didn't realize you were asking if I was affiliated with that website; no -- I didn't know it existed. I figured maybe you thought the name sounds like a construction company. Thanks – TARDIS Builder (talk) 21:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] OK; in accordance with coversation with blocking admin I will unblock. -- "talk" 22:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply ] Great Anthony, thanks. Do I get removed from the "promotional user names" hidden category now (I don't know how), or is it there for the record? – TARDIS Builder (talk) 23:35, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] This list is maintained by a bot; if I were to remove your name myself I suspect that the removal might be reversed by the bot. I have accordingly passed the request for removal of your name to the bot operator. -- "talk" 10:50, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply ]  Done Category removed. Avicennasis @ 03:45, 24 Kislev 5778 / 03:45, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

What's the policy with regard to incremental edits, whether or not for the purpose of increasing edit counts? For instance, what's to stop me or anyone else from correcting 3 misspellings over 3 edits rather than a single one? If it's not technically disallowed, what are the usual conventions (and any essays / policy docs)? Thanks! • - • TARDIS Builder (talk) 07:52, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe there is a specific policy disallowing or discouraging incremental edits or large single edits. I think that you should do whatever is most easiest and most convenient for you and not worry about edit count. You might want to take a look at

WP:EDITCOUNT which might contain some relevant information. Thanks, Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 09:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi TARDIS Builder! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 22:09, Friday, December 22, 2017 (

Hello, TARDIS Builder. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Original message here.

How about this, MusikAnimal? Any way to test if this will play nicely with scripts? I've moved all the formatting to the signature input on the Preferences page. This way I'm signing with 4 tildes instead of 3, and then 5. — TARDIS builder^💬   |     00:10, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TARDIS Builder: Looks good! reply-link recognizes it (though it errored out for unrelated reasons when I tried to reply…). I'm not certain about DiscussionTools because that's not available on English Wikipedia yet, but I assume it works. To identify comments, scripts and bots usually look for a line of text containing a link to a userpage or user talk page, with a timestamp at the very end of the line of text. That is true with your new signature, so it should be fine :) — MusikAnimal ^talk 00:25, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply ]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Article wizard/Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Tracy Thoms
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TARDIS Builder! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply ]