User talk:TUF-KAT/archive 13

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:23, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help at Master Juba, and sorry for the edit conflicts. Seems you and I are both copy editing at the same time! No worries, though; I've got to head off for the next hour or so, so have at it. Maybe leave a note in your edit summary when you're though, and I'll take over. Thanks again, — Dulcem (talk) 03:01, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Maelare, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maelare. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? gadfium 06:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Tua-Uo-Loa, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tua-Uo-Loa. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? FCSundae ∨^☃ (talk) 08:54, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:ArrestedDevelopmentRedempti.ogg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:31, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BadMoonRising.ogg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Badlands.ogg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BenHarperRedemptionSong.ogg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:43, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review of the

Hi Tuf-Kat, would you mind giving your 2 cents at this proposed move: Talk:Rapping#Merge.2C_poll? Cheers, Spellcast (talk) 15:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BrickHouse.ogg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:13, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A

Just goes to show that you learn something new every day! Please accept my apologies --JD554 (talk) 06:09, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Audio Barnstar
		You're getting an Audio Barnstar for tracking down and uploading the 1939 Lomax 'Southern States Recording Trip' recordings. They greatly improve the related articles. Thanks!  Channel ®   22:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MBisanz ^talk has noticed you do not have your e-mail currently set up and is requesting you enable your EmailUser function. Thanks!

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:06, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:14, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry I did not give you a better response in my first attempt. Your comments are valid and valued and as you can see from the edit history, we have made changes in the text to try and comply with your requests. Please help us create an FA and come to an agreement on wording. I have answered your request for links to the discussions on the Creed, the comments are on the bottom of the FAC page, not directly under your FAC comments. NancyHeise (talk) 03:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also posted this note at the bottom of the FAC page for you: "TufKat, I have just gone through again and made changes to the areas of concern to you that I think will meet to your satisfaction. Xandar has also addressed a couple of points and Gimmetrow has been a tremendous help here as well. Please take another look at the particular areas of concern you have listed because we have made changes to each area you tagged in your comments. Thanks for your comments, I apologize if we were a little slow and reluctant to make changes, our fault." Please come back. NancyHeise (talk) 05:25, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to all opposers of the

Thanks for entering the contest. You are now able to select the topic that you would like to work on. While it is a good idea to know which specific list you will work on before you select a topic, you do not have to submit your list until Thursday. Once you have a topic and a list, you can start work. However, you will not be able to submit an FLC until Sunday at 00:00 (GMT). Good luck and have fun! -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 18:15, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is just a quick reminder that you still need to pick a topic and a list. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 02:03, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The nomination of the above article was archived by the Featured Articles Director, with the comment that the page had again grown too long. He has asked that all remaining objectors produce a list of their specific problems with the article in its current form. These will then be addressed by the article's editorial team before re-presentation for FA status.

Can you therefore please post a complete list of any specific remaining objections you may have on the article's talk page at: Talk:Roman_Catholic_Church. If possible can we have this list in by the end of June, so that editors can begin to address them all in detail in July. To prevent the nomination again becoming over-long, we would ask that you raise ALL of your remaining concerns at this stage, making your comments as specific and comprehensive as possible. It would help if all your comments were gathered under your name in a single heading on the page. Thank you. Xandar (talk) 00:51, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious to hear more about what ideas you have. I might be able to sling together some code. Have you seen User:Pipian/My Sandbox? --Laser brain (talk) 05:40, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that the user who designed the musical instrument infoboxes, Pipian, has stopped editing. He hasn't been around in two months. Can we leverage his ideas at all? And what is involved in replacing existing infoboxes with new ones? --Laser brain (talk) 15:36, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If you have any idea about the what, when, where or other info on Image:USMarineMarch.ogg, could you please add it to the description page? Thanks! Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TK, since you're knowledgeable in this area, what do you think of Talk:Political hip hop#Merger proposal? Spellcast (talk) 20:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I nominated Evden eve nakliyat 3 times, until you deleted it. Thank you. I am new to this. If this happens again, where do I report this user/article. The creator of the article removed the deletion tag twice. My question is, how/where do I report this kind of act?

Tm93 (talk) 08:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• It would be much easier for me if you could write me back on my talk page. If I don't see one on my page within a week, I will assume that you replied on you page. Thank You and Happy Editing.Tm93 (talk) 08:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]