User talk:TeddyRome

March 2016

Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 15:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Your submission at
Roberto Wirth
(March 2)

Articles for Creation

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

Draft:Roberto Wirth

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:09, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! TeddyRome, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:09, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Roberto Wirth
(March 15)

Articles for Creation

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

What you have gathered here as "External links" are really what you need to use as references. Think of it like an academic article, where every statement of fact needs to be proven by referring to an outside source. That's what you need to do here. See

referencing instructions

on how to do that. The main work flow for creating a WP article is to gather things that have been written about the person (from reliable sources) and then write the article based on those. You have written the article first, possibly from your own knowledge, and that's going to make it more difficult. Try to follow the correct work flow and see if it helps you create a well-referenced article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Roberto Wirth
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 00:34, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi TeddyRome! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
The Teahouse new editor help space
Wikipedia Help pages

-- 14:52, Thursday, April 28, 2016 (

UTC

)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together