User talk:Terri G

Added some background Terri G 14:22, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The current History of Science Collaboration of the Month is Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Science/Collaboration of the Month/current.

--ragesoss 15:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Terri, I just wanted to drop a note to thank you for the suggestion on stubifying the red links. For some reason, it never crossed my mind that a stub was better than a red link. I fixed them as you suggested, and again, thank you for the advice. ~ (The Rebel At) ~ 13:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You voted on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Vernier caliper, but a new version has been proposed and we need to close the vote. If you could clarify your vote that would be very helpful. ed g2s • talk 15:01, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

	<font=3> Thanks again for your comments in Peer Review - featured article! Take care, Ruhrfisch 17:11, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply ]

Hello Terry. Please accept all my apologies indeed for the inadvertent cut-and-paste last year in P. aeruginosa article. Just came back a few days ago, found post about it on my talk page and it's been on my to-do list since then. I use at least two files when I edit, usually more, and had copied an unfinished version back to the article page :-( It was my last edit on it too (end of session, tired, closed several articles at once) and I didn't go back to that article after that or I could not have missed the mistake, it was clear with that “our work” left in it. The next day I did have a feeling something like that had happened somewhere, but couldn't think of where, had had too many articles on the go at that time.

From what you wrote last year, you are among the et al. who have worked on these experiments. Since I'm here for my atonement let me tell you how very impressed I have been at reading about these experiments and their results. Hem, it's even embarrassing, come to think of it. This article, pointing out at the vital importance of biofilm, has opened a whole fascinating level of reflections to me. Call that multi-dimensional because it's even made me completely rethink the whole process of tooth-brushing, take that for daily reminder; see another dimension to the concept of network; and no end in sight to the situations to which that concept of biofilm can be applied. I was awed, what can I say? This article could not have had a more capital impact on me than the apple's had to Newton. Now that you know about this you cannot but forgive me for any offence from that unvoluntary slip last year in reporting that work as I beg you to please do.

Of course I find this biofilm concept no less interesting now as then (although admitedly the state of exaltation has abated somewhat). Since the slip brought me back to the P. aeruginosa article, I hope I am not creating further offence by saying I still think that the details of your work are not out of place in that paragraph, and that its reading supports well the importance of the concept of biofilms. So I have gone back on what I had left on the article page last year, and propose this to you with hope that you will consider it as an acceptable presentation of your work:

Walker et al. reported in 2001, that when P. aeruginosa colonizes roots it protects itself by creating a biofilm which resists antibiotics secretions from the roots and spreads around these before the plant dies. Arabidopsis and

sweet basil

's root exudates secreted minimum inhibitory concentration levels of rosmarinic acid. The plant subsequently died.

sweet basil

, and its biofilm was similar to biofilms formed by wild-type strains of P. aeruginosa.(ref Walker)

I am grateful for any comment you would care to make. If you do so, as I am not quite sure of how wiki works for alerts for messages can I please ask you to let me know you've done so and where, by a note on my 'talk' page here User_talk:Basicdesign. Thank you very much. Françoise Basicdesign (talk) 16:54, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've stepped up to opposing here: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gephyrocapsa oceanica, as no action is being taken to resolve our concern. Maybe you'll want to do something similar.

Regards,

Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 12:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Information found, as requested. =) Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 17:29, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I have uploaded an edited version of the image at the nomination here. I hope that addresses your concerns. Could you have a look? Thanks --Muhammad(talk) 04:44, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your concerns have been addressed here. DS (talk) 12:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:48, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for creating the arabinogalactan protein article! I've modified it as per Article Wizard's suggestion. Keep up the great work! --pmj (talk) 00:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because you've contributed to FPC either recently or in the past, I'm letting you know about the above poll on the basis of which we may develop proposals to change our procedures and criteria. Regards, Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 12:50, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,

Can I please draw your attention to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Chemistry/Structure drawing, we have been moving all structures off en-wiki, as they can be used by all wikis - so they are all located on commons, which also has a much better categorisation system, so the image you need may already be there for you, saving you some time - see commons:Category:Chemical structures and sub cats. I'll leave the image for now, as it's too poor quality to move, I'll tag it for a re-draw as svg. Thanks for your time.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 01:47, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]