User talk:Testing times

Destruction of the Country House exhibition

If I knew how to nominate a page for "Do You know" I would nominate [1]

Returned 21:48, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

List of non-league clubs in the Fifth Round of the FA Cup since 1945

The article

List of non-league clubs in the Fifth Round of the FA Cup since 1945 has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

An unlikely intersection of barely notable categories - non-league clubs in the FA Cup, okay, but non-league clubs into the fifth round? and then, since 1945? There appears to be no evidence that this variety of intersections is notable in any way.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:08, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
List of non-league clubs in the Fifth Round of the FA Cup since 1945
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

List of non-league clubs in the Fifth Round of the FA Cup since 1945 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of non-league clubs in the Fifth Round of the FA Cup since 1945 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 08:48, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Golden raspberry

To be fair, I was waiting for it. Thanks for popping out of hibernation to deliver it. No hard feelings, I hope, I'm like Dweller, happy to re-evaluate. I'll read your lengthy argument in a moment, but as a rule of thumb, if I see an article that's called "X who did Y for Z before A" I immediately feel like it's contrived. In any case, will head back there now. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Testing times. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]