User talk:The Emperor's New Spy/Archive 4
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
If you are bored... :D
Hi! If you're bored, you could redecorate
- Ok I redid the Swedish consorts and I am now working on Norway and Denmark but I need you to do me a little favor. Can you give me the House names of all the Danish monarchs prior to the Kalmar Union? List of Danish monarchs doesn't give them and the monarch template doesn't help since it says House of Ylvinga when most of the articles for the monarchs say House of Estridsen. And who were the Knytlinga, the monarchs before them? --talk) 17:48, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Ok I redid the Swedish consorts and I am now working on Norway and Denmark but I need you to do me a little favor. Can you give me the House names of all the Danish monarchs prior to the Kalmar Union? List of Danish monarchs doesn't give them and the monarch template doesn't help since it says House of Ylvinga when most of the articles for the monarchs say House of Estridsen. And who were the Knytlinga, the monarchs before them? --
- Ok.--talk) 18:21, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Ok.--
- I am at a dilema with Norway. I'm not sure if I should list the wifes of the Jarl/Regent of Norway under the Danish Kings of Norway or the consort of the Danish Kings of Norway from the 976-995, 1000-1015 and 1028-1035. I never actually heard of a regent consort until I read the talk) 01:02, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- I am at a dilema with Norway. I'm not sure if I should list the wifes of the Jarl/Regent of Norway under the Danish Kings of Norway or the consort of the Danish Kings of Norway from the 976-995, 1000-1015 and 1028-1035. I never actually heard of a regent consort until I read the
That sounds fine!--David (talk) 15:14, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
consorts of Bavaria
If you are going to make a page on the duchesses of Bavaria then you may as well add it to your page on queens of bavaria. cheers-- David (talk) 15:46, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Do you want me to start it? I haven't got much to do at the moment. Cheers--David (talk) 16:54, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Sure. I really don't like these German minor monarchies because inheritance is so messy among them. There could be more than one Duke of Bavaria existing at one time. And the article on the monarchs of Bavaria, it list some Frankish kings who bore the title King of Bavaria but the only Frankish kings who ever use that title was
OK, but I can't start it today because I am rather busy in life but I will start it tommorrow. --David (talk) 19:37, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
I have done the later consorts and electresses. Are you going to do the earlier ones? --David (talk) 15:47, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Yes. I am now at the
All you need to do is finish the Wittlesbatch dynasty, they were the most important because they reigned the longest in Bavaria.--David (talk) 17:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
OK, I AM DONE. Check it out.--
Are you going to merge it with the queens? I need to know this before I start succession boxes and create an intoduction --David (talk) 15:43, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Do you know how to delete articles? It looks like we would have to take the current
Just go into edit mode on the duchess one, copy the entire content and paste it into Bavarian consorts,I'll do it if you want --David (talk) 09:36, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Ok. But we would lose all the edit histories. Just go ahead. --
The page is too big, the computer has trouble holding it. I think the Duchesses are going to need a seperate page.--David (talk) 10:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
I don't think it too big. Have you seen my article
Matilda and Welf
Hi, I checked Bernold of Constance, and he says Welf left Matilda because "she had never been touched by him" and "he had not yet had conjugal knowledge of her." This is on pg. 323 of "Eleventh-Century Germany: The Swabian Chronicles" by I.S. Robinson. Apparently it was an ill-advised attempt to unite the imperial and papal supporters, but Welf seems like nothing more than a pawn of both sides. Adam Bishop (talk) 12:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
WP:RD/H#Translation
It's been a week since you asked this question (you forgot to sign it, BTW), so I'm letting you know I just posted a response now. I hope you'll find this translation useful. — Kpalion(talk) 12:42, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Descendants of Charlemagne
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
A
- Lack of sources, lack of purpose, arbitrary cut-off. See Carolingian dynasty.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
- Note: I did not propose it, but felt it was worth letting you know that it was proposed. Odie5533 (talk) 16:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- Sure. Delete it. --talk) 01:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
This could be useful
Hello! I just found
- I already saw this page already, but thanks anyway. It would help when I start on more modern lists, but I now planning on a list of Duchesses of Brittany and maybe a Welsh or Irish list, and then perfect the Asturian list of consorts.--talk) 20:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Kotromanić family tree
Hello! Do you know how to use
- Sorry, I never mastered that template and the templates I used are not complicated at all.--talk) 22:03, 26 July 2009 (UTC)