User talk:The Lemmick unit in the sin

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 18:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the {{

A tag has been placed on RAC 125 (drink), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the

An article that you have been involved in editing, RAC 125 (drink), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RAC 125 (drink). Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 21:05, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Push off!--The Lemmick unit in the sin (talk) 14:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC) WANKERS!--The Lemmick unit in the sin (talk) 09:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because of concerns that the chosen username may not meet our username policy.

This is often not a reflection on the user, and you are encouraged to choose a new account name which does meet our guidelines and are invited to contribute to Wikipedia under an appropriate username. If you feel this block was made in error, you may quickly and easily appeal it - see below.

Our username policy provides guidance on selecting your username. In brief, usernames should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, related to a 'real-world' group or organization, confusing, or misleading.

If you have already made edits and wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name you may request a change in username which is quick and easy. To do so, please follow these directions:

1. Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page.
2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
3. Please note, you may only request a name that is not already in use. The account is created upon acceptance – do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change since we can far easier allocate your new name to you, if it is not yet used. Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. For more information, please visit Wikipedia:Changing username.

Last, the automated software systems that prevent vandalism may have been activated, which can cause new account creation to be blocked also. If you have not acted in a deliberately inappropriate manner, please let us know if this happens, and we will deactivate the block as soon as possible. You may also appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you.

--86.29.245.241 (talk) 14:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, don't you have anything better to do? This whole thing with the IPs and socks is pretty deep. You should consider finding a nice boyfriend or girlfriend or taking up a hobby or a sport or something. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 20:17, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you spam anymore talk pages with this message, this account will actually be blocked indefinitely. Natalie (talk) 13:55, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Lulz

I'll bet this guy is sockpuppeting for the lulz. — Rickyrab | Talk 21:09, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am Lulz,

This account is a sockpuppet of Lulz (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

I confess!--The Lemmick unit in the sin (talk) 09:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]