User talk:thedemonhog/2006
|
|
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Hello, thedemonhog, and
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
{{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Thanks for uploading the season 3 promotional image (Image:Seasonthree.jpg) this a good illustration of the cast and a valuable addition to the article. However, you did not add a fair use rationale when uploading this fair use image. It will have to be removed from the pages that feature it if no rationale is provided. For advice on how to produce a rationale see
Edits
It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the
Further Instructions
I've changed back almost all of your edits that assert that Further Instructions was the last flashback episode for many of the main characters. What Locke saw was a vision and not a flashback so it should not be classified as such. This is clearly seen by the fact that Desmond shows up as a pilot and Ben at the metal detector. The vision was just a metaphor for the situation the characters are currently in and was not a flashback in any way. Gdo01 20:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Tainted poll?
Hi. Sorry to bother you. You participated in a television episode article naming poll which now lives
Kate's image
You need to stop reverting Image:Katelost.jpg. There is no good reason to use the cleaned up promo picture over an image of Kate that is more "in character". Not only that, but you are reverting the image without updating the image description page, where I've made a specific write up to the fair use rational and source for the image. I really don't understand why you are objecting to that image. Is there a better one I can find, or will you revert any image that is not the promo image? -- Ned Scott 02:53, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
LOE for Lost
You are advised to discuss your addition on the talk page, it is clearly disputed. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 23:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
3RR Warn
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be