User talk:Tommy1964

Please do not arbitrarily add speedy-delete notices on articles that do not meet any of the criteria for speedy deletion. This is disruptive behaviour and contributes nothing to the project. Owen× ☎ 23:24, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I am sorry I used the "Delete" sign for that article, I did not realist that was wrong. I substituted the "Afd" sign, because I thought that was correct. I have not used "Delete" again. I don't understand why I should be blocked for this. Tommy1964 (talk) 21:22, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your block has nothing to do with the CSD tag. It is related to this. Owen× ☎ 21:50, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I seem to have stepped into problem areas by using the "Recent Changes" and "Random Article" features and a public computer. Tommy1964 (talk) 22:08, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contact this admin and explain the situation to him. Owen× ☎ 22:27, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but I am not interested in participating in a project which treats newcomers like this. I expected to see this injustice quickly checked and cleared. I see a lot of vandalism and articles with no sources put out by vandals and spammers here. I tried to help. Except for that one mistaken use of the "Delete" marker I am not aware that I have done anything improper. I have not even been informed what crime I am supposed to have committed, yet I have been blocked permanently. I gather that the person who blocked me has only justified his actions with a hunch that I am another editor. What that other editor's crimes are, I do not know, because not one shred of evidence has been offered to link us. I do not think there has even been a proper investigation, because I doubt a check of my Internet usage would show me to be the person I am accused of being. I use a public computer, but I still find it remarkable that my usage should be identical to the other editor, because of the simple fact that I am not that person. I was reading help pages and making an effort to learn how to work here constructively. Now I am happy that I did not invest more time here. Good luck to you, and thank you for at least having the decency to address me. Tommy1964 (talk) 18:47, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]