User talk:Tpkunesh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Tpkunesh, and

welcome
to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Alai
05:15, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

"a notion that i think is highly suspect"

Not so much "highly suspect" as just a nuisance — that article has been created and deleted several times already as a "Self-published internet movie with no assertion of notability whatsoever, no reliable sources, no mainstream media attention, etc". See the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeitgeist the Movie. / edg 22:38, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

lots of self-published stuff that's gotten dissed (eg,

something. good to know it's survived the test of time. tpk (talk) 21:11, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

A while back (11:03, 6 October 2007) you added to the IOOF page with the comment "added info on the common OF symbol - the three-link chain and initials F.L.T."

It is indeed a "common OF symbol", but I've never heard it referred to as "the three-link chain". In South Australia, it is referred to as the "Triple Links".

Have you ever heard of the expression, the "Triple Links"?

Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the Triple Links

not technically "heard it" (am not a member & don't know any) but have seen it - read it, and added it. my experience is from seeing them on gravemarkers in cemeteries all over the US, and at the entrance of one lodge here in Chattanooga. "three-link chain" is how some folks refer to it around here, esp. when they're new to cemetery iconics. thanks for the addition.  ;>

re:
List of unrecognized tribes in the United States
edits

I believe you are making these edits in good faith, however I have to disagree with the assessment that the "geographic" location of an editor should really be what's pertinent here. If I'm understanding your argument correctly, you're challenging the placement of some of the referenced material in the article based on your own personal observations, without offering any supporting reliable references to support your conclusions. I'd suggest that if you really want to move ahead in this situation, please provide other editors with some reliable sources to support what you're contending, without them, in my opinion you're engaged in

WP:OR. If you're attempting to challenge the validity or appropriateness of the source(s) currently being used to support the inclusion of material, please provide other editors with your reasoning for disputing their usefulness. Also, please do not continue to remove material from the article until consensus regarding the issue has been reached here on the article talk page. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 04:34, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of

WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion
will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of

talk) 19:45, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

reordering a dab page

Hi Tpkunesh. I hope you don't mind in this edit I reordered the First Unitarian Church disambiguation page back to geographic order (i.e. in the U.S. by state then city). This is the ordering that is applied in many dab pages of places listed on the National Register that I and others have developed (Smith House, First Presbyterian Church, Auburn Public Library, thousands more). These also include other, non-NRHP-listed places of the same name. Geographic order seems to make sense for readers and is allowed and has been discussed previously. Readers are likely to be looking for the place that is near to them, in their state, and can do the lookup easily. But if the same-state items are far away from each other because of alphabetical sorting and minor differences in punctuation, they could fail to find the one of interest to them; geographic order seems to work well for lists of places. Happy to discuss if you like; i'll watch here and should see any reply. But please contact me if I don't. I noticed you made other improvement to the dab page, too, thanks. Keep up your good work. Sincerely, --doncram 06:07, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i don't mind at all - as long as i understand the method to what i previously took as madness. ;) tpk (talk) 14:01, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Articles for Creation
. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Technical Research Ship Special COMMunications
concern

Hi there, I'm

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Technical Research Ship Special COMMunications
, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

Userfication
of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

WP:REFUND/G13
.

Thank you for your attention.

talk) 18:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at
Technical Research Ship Special COMMunications
(September 18)

Articles for Creation
. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at AfC
Technical Research Ship Special COMMunications
was accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 00:49, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Mary Kelly Kunesh-Podein
(June 4)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 18:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Tpkunesh, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 18:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

added
Citico (Hamilton County, Tennessee)

Demographic profiles

Hello, Tpkunesh. I noticed that you adjusted the demographic profile at Chattanooga, Tennessee#Demographics. But your changes were based on an incorrect reading of the data. Under the US Census Bureau's definitions, "Hispanic/Latino" is a cultural designation that is applied regardless of race. I've undone your changes to that article and, later today, I'll undo the similar changes you made to the article on Cannon Ball, South Dakota. But if you've made similar changes to other articles, you'll want to undo those, as well. NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:51, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Mary Kelly Kunesh-Podein
has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 18:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of place names of Native American origin in the United States, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Natchez and Tuscarora (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

December 2023

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Spotted Elk, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the

help desk
for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 22:12, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]