User talk:Tractakid
V8 Reply
Well, we all have to start somewhere - I know I was once at that point. Key things are to make the article's subject's first mention bold, punctuate fully and check your own spelling. Beyond that just enjoy editing!!! I'll keep a watch on your contributions for a while, make sure nothing's unfairly deleted, clean up where needed. Have fun!
- I wanna do Groveway, if you start it I'll add to it. Saxon, Brickhill, Childs and Dansteed seem to be the only other notable ones (I've done Grafton and Bletcham, Watling is part of Watling Street and those like Monks and Standing come under A-road articles (e.g. A421 road). I don't know if ones like Ridgeway are notable enough, but maybe. Tom walker 22:23, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- Its an idea. Then again, Portway has everything Hazely-Loughton that isn't A509, Tongwell has Broughton-Tonwell. But for now I think Grove, Brickhill, Saxon, Childs and Dansteed. Maybe Chaffron too. Tom walker 16:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yeh, do that because it is a bit italicy at the moment. Then if you wanna start any of those listed before, do so and I will expand it. Tom walker 16:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's good, but I'm being pressured a bit by another user to merge all of these articles into a single grid system article. See the talk page on H6 Childs Way. Tom walker 22:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC)]
- It's good, but I'm being pressured a bit by another user to merge all of these articles into a single grid system article. See the talk page on
MK
Hello... Just to let you know that I've been doing a bit of tidying on the existing MK roads articles - have added more of the A roads to the category, and have made the tables of roundabouts consistent on the pages. It's actually been fairly useful to cross-check as I've been doing it against the List of road junctions in the United Kingdom, as having the lists of junctions geographically allows mistakes in the former to be easily spotted and changed. I have linked each of the junctions tables to this page, as it's the one with the grid refs etc. on it. Regards, C2r 18:02, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
H4
It doesn't do any 'harm' but I think it should be merged. Belive me I used to ask this sort of question myself, I used to hate my articles beig deleted. But no what I think we should be aiming for with the grid system is the big article covering everything except for the real biggans (that aren't A roads) - H6, H9, H10, V6, V8. If you want (check the discussion on it first) remove my deletion notice, move the H4 article to H9 Groveway and convert it into that. Tom walker 14:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
re: [dweeb]
You cannot. Brackets are not allowed by the software (see
Happy Birthday!
Idontknow610TM 19:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:It came from outer space cover.JPG)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:19, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
First Edit Day
Happy First Edit Day
Idontknow610TM 14:22, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:St-Pauls logo.JPG
Thanks for uploading
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
- Wikipedia:Image use policy
- Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:11, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:St.Paul's logo.JPG
Thanks for uploading
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
- Wikipedia:Image use policy
- Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:01, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:St.Paul's logo.JPG
Thanks for uploading
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
- Wikipedia:Image use policy
- Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Happy first edit day!
Happy Birthday (2012)
Happy First Edit Day
Happy First Edit Day
Happy First Edit Day
Proposed deletion of Dweeb (band)
The article Dweeb (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- The subject fails to meet the notability standards set in WP:NALBUM.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Steel1943 (talk) 23:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Tractakid. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Dweeb (band) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dweeb (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Boleyn (talk) 09:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The article It Came from Outer Space! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Doesn't meet
WP:GNG. Suggesting deletion rather than redirect, as it's an ambiguous title and likely to lead people to the wrong place. Nothing worth merging, all unreferenced.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 09:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:It came from outer space cover2.JPG
Thanks for uploading
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ GB fan 10:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:MooseMMChickenM.JPG
Thanks for uploading
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 20 August 2021 (UTC)