User talk:TreacherousWays

There is nothing to discuss.

Archive 1

Just to let you know, I've removed your speedy deletion tag from

Thanks for letting me know. I may follow through, though I think I'm done with patrolling for a while. TreacherousWays (talk) 18:08, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I can appreciate that there is quite a bit of ambiguity in the

scare some new contributors off. --Mrmatiko (talk) 18:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

I don't think that I misinterpreted the criteria or that I got it wrong; I'm as confident of my assessment as you are of yours, and I still feel that the article could have been deleted for either spam or notability without issue. It was a new article on a for-profit organization that emerged fully-formed from a SPA. I think that it is part of a group of articles that are mutually supporting and placed on wikipedia for promotional purposes. Unless, that is, you assert that a "newcomer" threw together an infobox and formatted wikilinks, bulleted lists, references, and external links on their first try. TreacherousWays (talk) 18:28, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They submitted it through

Articles for Creation and it was approved by another editor. They received a fair amount of assistance from multiple people from the AfC project. --Mrmatiko (talk) 19:02, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

I was uanaware of the assistance, and might have hesistated asserting speedy had I known. Nonetheless, and with all due respect to your opinion and those of the reviewers and the article creator, I stand by my assertion. As with other things, I know it when I see it. It doesn't mean that I'm right, merely that I know my opinion. TreacherousWays (talk) 19:09, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A brief review of the AfC process suggests to me that the other editor wasn't too impressed by the subject of the article, either " ... (Declining submission: subject appears to be a non-notable company or organization) ... edit history TreacherousWays (talk) 19:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That is indeed true, the article was rejected twice after which

WP:A7 from applying. --Mrmatiko (talk) 19:30, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Please see the discussion at Talk:Straight_pride#Proposed_merge. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 04:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice; your good faith does not go unremarked. TreacherousWays (talk) 16:23, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Someone forgot to tell you that they were complaining about you in a venue. [1], so I thought I would let you know. Dennis Brown (talk) 02:26, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. TreacherousWays (talk) 10:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by