User talk:Triash

Cute, but not funny. Go back to your main account and we might take you seriously. Guy (Help!) 12:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Triash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

If my complaint is not serious, why the article Total Recorder is deleted now? And why this admin JzG blocked me without asking further proof? Why this JzG reverted my post on Jimbo's talk page? This Administrator JzG also blocked User:Abhih for going hard after spam. Now he is asking me to go back to my main account which is irrational because my User:Abhih account is also blocked by this same administrator. Also it is very suspicious. There are 1300+ administrators and thousands of users. How the same administrator JzG turned up in few minutes to block me? According to theory of probability, this coincidence is very suspicious. This admin blocked me for 15 days citing reason 'until after Diwali'. Am I supposed to wait 15 days for reporting spam, vandalism on wikipedia? Why the explaination is not called from admin FCYTravis to restore that page and showing interest in commercial edits of new user? If spammers know the tactics to change IP address, usernames to post spam, then I am hundred steps ahead of them to track these spammers. I am not going to allow spammers on wikipedia. Triash 14:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Using sockpuppets for block evasion is prohibited. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 15:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think the source of this problem is User:WAS 4.250. First I reported some Article on WP:ANI. Then I reported Total Recorder. At this point User:WAS 4.250 dropped in and said something like business competition. And this 24 year old FCYTravis restored Total Recorder even though that article had no references. FCYTravis even removed PROD by admin Setori Son without any references, explaination. This was strong reason to raise suspicion combined with his claim of professional writer, commercial journalist and other dubious edits.

I will not accuse FCYTravis to be using tactics of mywikibiz.com. I think this 24 year old boy is behaving like 24 year old boy.

Further, I would like to tell all administrators that if new page patroller do not check references then these articles are cleared for eternity. Once such article enter in wikipedia fort, they hide for years without reference. If FCYTravis think we should give time to provide references, then how many years are left for article like V&S Group which was created on 8 Nov 2003?

And there are indeed thousands of such articles. Does FYCTravis think that it is responsibility of new page patrollers and admin to search reliable sources?

Someone made comments in that thread creating new username(If I am correct, username was Bulamik). I can't see it now as thread seems to be archieved or something like that. Someone made comments that it is my sockpuppet. I request you to give checkuser to trace original IP. One person can not exist in two countries.

I apologize to FCYTravis. But his professional writer, commercial journalism, edits are dubious.

In the end, I would like to dedicate this whole episode to

Oh, and don't forget articles like V&S Group. There are thousands such articles.

Thanks. Triash 19:47, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]