]
Welcome to Wikipedia. I became aware of your contributions through the
]
Tri-State Beirut has been proposed for deletion . An editor felt the subject might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.
If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk ) 22:26, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
License tagging for Image:Philadelphia Growl.gif
Thanks for uploading
image description page
indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot . If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions . 00:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Founders Cup.jpg . The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot . For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions . 08:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
License tagging for Image:Boston Swamp Rats.gif
Thanks for uploading
image description page
indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot . If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions . 09:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:York_Typhoon.gif . The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot . For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions . 11:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:34, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
A {{
]
Image Copyright problem
Thank you for uploading
image description page
.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:55, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Image Copyright problem
Thank you for uploading
image description page
.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 09:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:37, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:26, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:21, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:35, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:36, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Image Copyright problem
Thank you for uploading
image description page
.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 19:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 20:14, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 21:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 21:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 21:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 22:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading Image:Best Overall Record Trophy.jpg . You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content , but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions .
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk ) 03:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. BJBot (talk ) 13:04, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to
here
.
Please go to
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Closedmouth (talk ) 06:19, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[ reply ]
I have tagged
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you.
Closedmouth (
talk ) 09:57, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
[ reply ]
I have tagged
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you.
Melesse (
talk ) 04:05, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottdale Inferno until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jay Jay Talk to me 01:24, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
]
The article Pittsburgh Bandits has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
It doesn't seem a notable team. The league it is *currently* is isn't notable per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Inline Hockey League and I don't think the prior league is notable either.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ricky81682 (talk ) 06:05, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2007–08 PIHA season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007–08 PIHA season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 19:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Western Conference Championship (PIHA) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western Conference Championship (PIHA) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 19:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eastern Conference Championship (PIHA) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastern Conference Championship (PIHA) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 19:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Rupp Award is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Rupp Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 02:26, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aston Demolition is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aston Demolition until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 02:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2006–07 NCRHA Division I season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006–07 NCRHA Division I season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 19:13, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of inline hockey competitions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of inline hockey competitions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 19:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Founders Cup (PIHA) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Trivial and non-notable. Fails WP:SPORTCRIT
. Completely unsourced. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user who has since left.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 17:25, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Joe Cook Award (PIHA) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Trivial and non-notable. Fails WP:SPORTCRIT
. Completely unsourced. Full of redlinks and broken templates. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user who has since left.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 17:26, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Professional Inline Hockey Association awards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Trivial and non-notable. Fails WP:SPORTCRIT
. Completely unsourced. Full of redlinks and broken templates. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user who has since left.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 17:27, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
⚠ Thanks for uploading claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. --B-bot (talk ) 18:07, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
⚠ Thanks for uploading claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. --B-bot (talk ) 18:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
⚠ Thanks for uploading claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. --B-bot (talk ) 18:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Eastern Conference (PIHA) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Almost all pages linked to from here have been deleted via WP:NOTWEBHOST
.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 17:11, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Western Conference (PIHA) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Almost all pages linked to from here have been deleted via WP:NOTWEBHOST
.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 17:11, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article 2007 Founders Cup Playoffs (PIHA) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The main article, WP:SPORTCRIT
.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 20:18, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article 2007 Blue-Grey Classic (PIHA) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The main article, WP:SPORTCRIT
.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 20:20, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Most Valuable Player Award (PIHA) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Almost every page and article linked to from this page has been deleted at AFD.n Entirely unsourced. Trivial and non-notable. Fails WP:SPORTCRIT
.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 22:20, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article List of defunct PIHA teams has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Almost all pages linked to from here have been deleted via WP:NOTWEBHOST
.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 01:28, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Keystone Division (PIHA) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Almost all pages linked to from here have been deleted via WP:NOTWEBHOST
.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 05:52, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Northeast Division (PIHA) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Almost all pages linked to from here have been deleted via WP:NOTWEBHOST
.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 05:52, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Delaware Valley Division (PIHA) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Almost all pages linked to from here have been deleted via WP:NOTWEBHOST
.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 05:52, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
⚠ Thanks for uploading claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. --B-bot (talk ) 19:27, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
⚠ Thanks for uploading claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. --B-bot (talk ) 19:54, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Most Valuable Player Award (PIHA) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Most Valuable Player Award (PIHA) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (Talk to me /What I been doing ) 16:59, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]