User talk:Unknown

This is a rather confusing username! MrBeast 20:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am.

Yes, I know. Unknown 23:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whee.

Unknown (talk) 21:24, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

==

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a

This was a mistake by

user:mono - you have been removed from the case. Sorry about that, Airplaneman ✈ 21:39, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

... and I have been using it for quite a while. I don't think it's causing any problems. Unknown (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into

sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/unknown, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations

, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Hearfourmewesique (talk) 14:11, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I used Twinkle to report the other editor and instead of an unknown user, it marked you because of your username . Feel free to ignore the SPI altogether. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 14:18, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into

sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Unknown, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations

, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

CatcherStorm ^talk 17:05, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As before, you are mistaken. Unknown (talk) 20:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into

sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Unknown, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations

, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Legacypac (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Miracle_of_Lanciano#%22Scientific_tests%22_-_a_joke

would you like to look at that page again?Mr. bobby (talk) 09:29, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hey @Unknown! wanted to share w you the doc for the template to try to keep it consistent, thanks! RGNROK- (talk) 17:45, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll keep that in mind. Unknown (talk) 17:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laputa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laputa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Natg 19 (talk) 20:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]