User talk:VederJuda

Hello, VederJuda, and

• If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
• Always
  sign your posts
  on talk pages with ~~~~ so others will know who left which comments.
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Our
  simplified ruleset
• How to
  write a great article
• The
  picture tutorial
• The handy Manual of Style
• And finally, remember to
  be bold
  in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a

Happy editing!

-- Sango123 17:54, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Hello VederJuda,

Here's an invitation to visit

Best regards,

Fg2 01:21, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

The games you added to the list were already on there as

I never even saw those... -- VederJuda 21:36, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert back to User:68.98.147.30's apparent meaningless contributions to this article? Ereinion 22:11, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I got caught in the middle of a bunch of edits and your revert, I was trying to revert one of his other edits at the time and didn't notice that he put a bunch in. My bad. -- VederJuda 22:28, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please don't make cut and paste moves. It destroys the page history. I've moved the page for you. There should be a tab at the top of every page (next to watch) saying "move" that allows you to do this. (If you don't have it, then it's probably not available to you because you're a new user or something like that.) Thanks, and keep on editing. Johnleemk | Talk 13:26, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I never saw that, or at least I never noticed it. And I think I made some minor edits when I moved it, were those deleted? -- VederJuda 13:27, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately those edits were lost because I had to delete the page to make way for the move. Sorry about that. Johnleemk | Talk 13:41, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No prob, I fixed them; and thanks for pointing out the "move" thing, hopefully I'll remember that next time. -- VederJuda 13:43, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno what it is with that vandal, but do you think a page protect is in order? if not, I guess a temporary block.

If he (she) does it again, I am very tempted to throw a vprotect on it. -- VederJuda 21:01, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to The Price Is Right, the term "Showcase Showdown" does in fact refer to the segments involving the Big Wheel, while the endgame is known simply as "the Showcase." This can be confirmed several times in any given episode.

I don't mean to make a federal case of it, but this has always been a pet peeve of mine. TPIRFanSteve 17:06, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you serious? That seems so odd since there are NO showcases while spinning the Big Wheel. I'm definitely going to have to pay attention on the next episode. -- VederJuda 17:31, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure am. The Showcase Showdown is showdown in which people qualify for the Showcase. Matter of fact, this website has audio of the very first Showcase Showdown from September 8, 1975. TPIRFanSteve 17:56, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just watched, and you're right, he does call the spin-off a "Showcase Showdown". To paraphrase the Kids in the Hall, my mind has been blown! -- VederJuda 22:28, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, when you consider that the Showcase had already been around for three years when the Showcase Showdown was invented, it really isn't that odd. TPIRFanSteve 00:04, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I assume this was an edit conflict? Please be more careful in future, I almost gave you the standard vandal warning. ;) --JiFish(^Talk/_Contrib) 00:02, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, someone added some junk so I tried to delete it. -- VederJuda 00:04, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If we could get your opinion on this that would be great, thanks. The general agreement seems to be that is should be "[Wii]" not "Revolution [Wii]". --

I wanted the pattern of

I nominated the "Nintendo Wii" redirect page for speedy deletion because I wanted it removed so that Wii could be moved to it. You know that moving articles to titles that already exist is not allowed.

--NicAgent 23:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hear you, you're not the only person to think it should be "Nintendo Wii"; but if had checked the discussion page for Wii, you would have realized that it had been debated to death. -- VederJuda 23:15, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you had any comments about what is going on at

I'm a little annoyed nobody made a declaration on the individual pages before going ahead with the merge. But anyway, since I was watching the Krystal page, and that page was a lot bigger, I suppose it should have remained, and a link to that page should exist as a "main article" link on the list of characters page. Also, I dispute the exact wording of: "where she finds and joins the Star Wolf team to spite Fox." After playing through the game for all 9 endings, I don't think she joined Star Wolf explicity to spite Fox; yes, she acts coldly to Fox throughout much of the game, but it seems that she only sided with Star Wolf for the sake of fighting the Anglar invasion and not for the purpose of showing Fox up. It also doesn't mention that she was in a relationship with Panther, although it is mentioned in Panther's section. -- VederJuda 15:30, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Wii (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 12:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bit of confusion while trying to revert some vandalism, and I accidentally reverted to another vandalised version; then AntiVandalBot reverted to the vandalized version I was trying to fix. Weird. -- VederJuda 12:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did X-Play review this game; if so, why doesn't the G4 website have the review there? -- VederJuda 20:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I'm asking here is because I want to know if that review is real or not, and if not then it shouldn't be here; so don't delete my post my like that. -- VederJuda 22:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the link to the X-Play review:

http://www.g4tv.com/pile_player.aspx?video_key=15036 –Gunslinger47 21:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

nt - A Link to the Past (talk) 02:19, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there VederJuda,

I've noted that you've contributed before to the

]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 66.230.200.145 lifted or expired. Request handled by: Veinor (talk to me) 22:24, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply ]

Item drop

A "{{

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BirgitteSB 16:29, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Advice

I am new so I need some adviceSonicriders 01:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Sonicriders[reply]

Self-Experimentation - In Fiction

Could you take a look at the discussion of your addition to the Self-Experimentation article ? I like the idea, but would like to sharpen up the cases and possibly include a discussion of implications. DCDuring 16:23, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UsagiYojimboVol3Issue20Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

talk) 02:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UsagiYojimboVol3Issue6Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

talk) 02:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of New Game Plus

The article New Game Plus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article consists entirely of OR based on a neologism sourced to a video game blog. OR tag and NOTABILITY tag have been in place for a year while REF tag has been unaddressed for 2 years. Plenty of time for any improvement to happen.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

L0b0t (talk) 13:31, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:UsagiYojimboVol1Issue38Cover.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:29, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UsagiYojimboVol3Issue52Cover.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UsagiYojimboVol3Issue43Cover.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:25, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]