User talk:Vice regent/Archives/2012/November

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

recent edit

I don't understand your edit, [1]. You write "Israel occupied Gaza Strip after the

Six Day war". The second clause is of no relation to the first. The removal of Israeli settlers has no bearing on the 45 year military occupation of Gaza which continues unabated. Please edit it to remove the connective "although". Thank you. Sepsis II (talk

) 03:56, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

The Israeli occupation of 1967 is different from today's occupation. Back then, Israel literally occupied Gaza. Today it only controls Gaza's airspace and coast. The 2005 disengagement significantly reduced the level of Israeli occupation.VR _talk 04:00, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Warning

File:Yes

The Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision
" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures

, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Please self-revert your recent removal of sourced material and unconsensual change which is at least your second reversion. Ankh.Morpork 16:06, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Warning?

Hi,

You left a warning on my talk page. You said I have made two reversions. I don't see that, the moving of the details from casualties is only one reversion. And I that has done after I discussed on the talk page. Where is the second reversion?VR _talk 16:18, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

You additionally removed content and sources. This was undiscussed. Nor was there consensus for the move especially as you had already attempted something similar earlier on today. Please revert your changes and removals. I will clarify your reversions further at an appropriate noticeboard if you do not revert. Ankh.Morpork 16:22, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

November 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Ankh.Morpork 17:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Apology accepted. I again request that you revert your changes so that this dispute can be resolved and discussion can take place. Ankh.Morpork 18:03, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for accepting my apology, but don't you think you owe me one too? (Since you modified my comment).

Anyway, discussion can progress, and I'm waiting for your response on the article talk page.VR _talk 18:09, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Replay

Hi, I have made further comment on the topic at

Talk:Operation_Pillar_of_Defense#False_edit_summary, which I would like to you to address, thank you. --Mor2 (talk

) 08:29, 21 November 2012 (UTC)